CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2019
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2017, 2018, 2019.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Simon Kucher Partners
01
98.9%
PricewaterhouseCoopers
01
97.7%
Parthenon Group-EY
05
96.6%
Bain & Company
02
95.4%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
02
94.3%
Navigant Consulting
10
93.1%
Accenture
No
92.0%
PwC
01
90.8%
McKinsey and Co
04
89.7%
Gartner group
02
88.5%
LEK Consulting
06
87.4%
Capgemini
21
86.2%
Charles River Associates
08
85.1%
ClearView Healthcare Partners
03
83.9%
ZS Associates
01
82.8%
Deloitte
01
81.6%
Booz Allen Hamilton
09
80.5%
Capco
14
79.3%
Strategy&
03
78.2%
Berkeley Research Group
05
77.0%
Putnam Associates
08
75.9%
Altman Vilandrie & Company
07
74.7%
Oliver Wyman
No
73.6%
Mercer
14
72.4%
Protiviti
01
71.3%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants
05
70.1%
Huron Consulting Group
08
69.0%
Cornerstone Research
08
67.8%
Analysis Group
12
66.7%
Willis Towers Watson
13
65.5%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Cartesian (69.3%)
New
99.0%
Kaiser Associates (68.4%)
No
97.9%
public Resource Management Group (63.1%)
02
96.9%
Altman Vilandrie & Company (38.8%)
01
95.9%
Willis Towers Watson (36.0%)
05
94.8%
Slalom (35.9%)
New
93.8%
Stax (35.9%)
New
92.8%
Capco (35.4%)
02
91.8%
Korn Ferry (35.1%)
New
90.7%
NERA Economic Consulting (32.7%)
02
89.7%
The Brattle Group (31.6%)
12
88.7%
Analysis Group (31.1%)
05
87.6%
Willamette Management Associates (30.8%)
New
86.6%
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (30.8%)
New
85.6%
A.T. Kearney (30.7%)
06
84.5%
Gartner group (29.7%)
01
83.5%
Charles River Associates (29.5%)
18
82.5%
LEK Consulting (28.9%)
06
81.4%
Cornerstone Research (28.6%)
14
80.4%
ECG Management Consultants (27.0%)
New
79.4%
West Monroe Partners (24.4%)
01
78.4%
CohnReznick LLP (24.0%)
09
77.3%
Protiviti (23.5%)
02
76.3%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (23.1%)
New
75.3%
IMS Consulting Group (19.7%)
03
74.2%
Bain & Company (19.5%)
01
73.2%
McKinsey and Co (19.4%)
01
72.2%
KPMG (19.3%)
New
71.1%
Health Advances LLC (19.3%)
12
70.1%
Huron Consulting Group (19.2%)
02
69.1%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Liberty Advisor Group (76.6%)
No
99.0%
MFR Consultants Inc (62.6%)
No
97.9%
Gartner group (58.1%)
01
96.9%
UnitedHealth Group (51.6%)
01
95.9%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (42.6%)
New
94.8%
First Derivatives (35.5%)
01
93.8%
PA Consulting Group (31.8%)
No
92.8%
Marshall and Stevens (26.6%)
No
91.8%
Capco (25.3%)
No
90.7%
West Monroe Partners (24.3%)
66
89.7%
CohnReznick LLP (23.6%)
60
88.7%
The Parthenon Group (22.6%)
No
87.6%
Ernst & Young (22.6%)
05
86.6%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (21.4%)
08
85.6%
EisnerAmper LLP (21.3%)
No
84.5%
Meketa Investment Group (18.8%)
06
83.5%
Teneo (18.8%)
01
82.5%
Slalom (18.8%)
New
81.4%
KPMG (18.8%)
New
80.4%
Capgemini (18.0%)
No
79.4%
Alvarez & Marsal (17.5%)
05
78.4%
FTI Consulting (16.6%)
08
77.3%
Crowe Horwath (16.4%)
56
76.3%
Chatham Financial (16.1%)
New
75.3%
Bates White Economic Consulting (16.1%)
No
74.2%
BVA Group (16.1%)
New
73.2%
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (16.1%)
New
72.2%
Compass Lexecon (14.1%)
11
71.1%
Parthenon Group-EY (13.9%)
01
70.1%
Willis Towers Watson (13.3%)
07
69.1%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Phillip Townsend Associates Inc (60.5%)
No
99.0%
OCC Strategy Consultants (33.8%)
No
97.9%
Renaissance Strategic Advisors (20.3%)
No
96.9%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (12.2%)
02
95.9%
Booz Allen Hamilton (9.8%)
04
94.8%
Arthur D. Little (8.6%)
02
93.8%
Alvarez & Marsal (5.4%)
74
92.8%
Capco (5.1%)
03
91.8%
Simon Kucher Partners (4.9%)
02
90.7%
Accenture (4.9%)
No
89.7%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (4.5%)
03
88.7%
Cornerstone Research (4.4%)
68
87.6%
Willis Towers Watson (3.3%)
02
86.6%
PwC (3.3%)
04
85.6%
A.T. Kearney (2.9%)
03
84.5%
McKinsey and Co (2.6%)
02
83.5%
FTI Consulting (2.4%)
02
82.5%
Mercer (2.0%)
01
81.4%
Deloitte (1.9%)
03
80.4%
Oliver Wyman (1.6%)
01
79.4%
Strategy& (1.4%)
01
78.4%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (1.3%)
01
77.3%
IBM (1.2%)
62
76.3%
Bain & Company (0.8%)
62
75.3%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (0.5%)
New
74.2%
Kaufman Hall and Associates (0.5%)
No
73.2%
The Parthenon Group (0.5%)
No
72.2%
HealthScape Advisors (0.5%)
New
71.1%
Ernst & Young (0.5%)
18
70.1%
Wavestone (0.5%)
New
69.1%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?