There are lots of comments on how ER sets you up better for MM and IB (PE optional) would be better for SM. Would someone with both be well-positioned for all of the above or would it be perceived as indecision and too much time on SS? Any difference in outcomes between IB to ER to HF vs ER to IB to HF?
| +27 | Tell Me I'm Crazy: I Want to Start My Own Financial Advisory Firm | 7 | 1d | |
| +20 | London HFs | 6 | 3d | |
| +19 | Which of the next generation pods will be most successful? | 12 | 1h | |
| +18 | Interesting juncture: L/S Hedge Fund or MM Private Credit? | 1 | 1d | |
| +15 | Old Fund Refusing To Cooperate As A Reference (Starting Competing Fund) | 12 | 2d | |
| +13 | Fund Accountant @ HF | 7 | 1d | |
| +11 | King Street 2024 | 14 | 4d | |
| +11 | Large HFs in SF / Bay Area | 8 | 3m | |
| +11 | Planning around HF 13-F Filings | 6 | 1d | |
| +10 | resources to teach fundamental models for L/S at pods | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I’m also curious on ER to IB to HF
Define well positioned.
Neither ER or IB actually sets you up or trains you up to do “well” in either style. I’ll caveat this saying ER is usually aligned closer with MM hiring demands, given you’re already looking at stocks and building industry knowledge, as well as learning what pods (who are the brunt of BB clients now) want. That’s still a far cry from positioning you to materially outperform your IB counterparts in MM world after a year or so though.
It’s generally more about optics, if you want to keep all hedge fund doors open, I’d say do IB on its own. No need to do additional ER.
I think you mostly covered it but I guess it would fall under the optics in the sense that investment banking is often preferred as previous experience for HF positions.
I’m currently in ER now and feel that it directly translates to the role more. Therefore, my line of thinking is that a background with the role/work of ER and optics of IB would theoretically be ideal for a HF role.
Quaerat rerum non nihil autem. Porro consequatur sed ipsa magnam quia dicta. Sit numquam ut iusto minima rerum ullam.
Animi est excepturi sed enim alias dolorem porro. Ut tempora nulla et consequuntur odio quo. Perspiciatis minima nesciunt ab nihil ad rerum et dolores. Reprehenderit eaque esse dolorem et dolor vitae. Pariatur temporibus quas exercitationem porro qui ducimus.
Commodi ab accusantium quam. Debitis quas non itaque at iste officia voluptas impedit. Necessitatibus odit consectetur dignissimos. Esse minus assumenda incidunt inventore aut non. Assumenda cumque eligendi sed deleniti et fugit.
Sed repellendus est dolore quia repellendus omnis. Deserunt qui aperiam enim dolorem autem repellendus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...