Curious what the collective community thinks about funds that were once $1B+, but due to losses and then redemptions are now in the low 100s of AUM, assuming the fund is a going concern at the current point. Chances that the fund grows again? Does the industry ever award 2nd chances? What about thoughts on working in this type of environment...?
| +28 | Risk VS Volatility | 6 | 1d | |
| +27 | Undergrad HF Internships? | 31 | 1d | |
| +26 | The emotional rollercoaster of trading for HF | 4 | 10h | |
| +19 | How is PnL calculated for purposes of determining a portfolio manager's bonus? | 7 | 22h | |
| +19 | Are distressed HFs still viable? | 12 | 2d | |
| +19 | Advice - IB to Investing (Regret?) | 4 | 2d | |
| +17 | Does cfa matter? | 5 | 3d | |
| +15 | Credit comps | 9 | 4d | |
| +13 | List of large SMs that still have a longer term investment horizon? | 13 | 23h | |
| +11 | How Long Before Team Gets Cut | 21 | 21h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
"If they're down by 50%, they're probably going to 0". Remember that in one of the books I read.
I don't have any personal experience here, but it sounds like they just might close up shop soon. The best days are behind them and unless the fund manager is a well-known, very respected guy, then I don't see this fund coming back. Just stay in contact when they launch the next one.
I'd say this one's pretty context-dependent. I wouldn't write off a fund just because it's smaller than it used to be. It makes a very big difference whether the size change is primarily due to losses or primarily due to redemptions. If the former, you're looking at an uphill battle to get back to the high watermark, plus I wouldn't be too excited about working for a PM who just lost a ton of money, both in terms of competence and work environment. On the other hand, an otherwise reasonably performing fund could shrink dramatically with the loss of an anchor investor. There are lots of reasons investors pull money and they don't all have to do with dissatisfaction - it could be they were seeded by a FoF that's winding down, for example. If the fund isn't closing after losing that big a chunk of its assets, presumably the founder likes the job and has some backers. Also, why are they hiring? Normally funds that have shrunk 80% aren't looking to add headcount. Maybe they've got a new capital commitment or things have somehow changed for the better.
The industry inexplicably gives lots of second chances, but the whys and wherefores matter. You should make your own decision about the nature of the losses - how bad are we talking? Was it a short-term mark-to-market thing with impatient capital? Is it a concentrated fund with one bad position? Did they have bad luck or bad analysis? Was there a failure of risk management? Was management irresponsible in some way?
I would echo the previous poster. While the AUM drop is a cause for some concern, everything very much depends on why this occurred.
If the PM had a solid 10 year run, piled up $200mm of his own cash, and just wanted to run his own money it could potentially be a great scenario.
Maybe they got in trouble for insider trading (7 or 8 times) and the gov't couldn't nail the founder/head PM but forced them to return outside money and operate as a family office.
Just to answer everyone, were talking poor relative returns which caused investors to flee. It seems like in that case it's the worst scenario.
If that is the case run and don't look back
I would say it also depends on the duration of the poor returns. If he only screwed up '13 and just has harsh LPs, there's more hope than having poor returns all the way from, say, '07-'13.
Stay away. I can't imagine a scenario where the PM could explain away such poor returns (and client defections) that future potential investors will ask about. Fund raising will be tough.
Plus, the existing AUM could potentially be well under the high water mark leaving performance fees out of the question.
It's all hypothetical, but would you want to work for a fund with $200m AUM that only generates 2% management fees?
it really depends on what your other options are, but I would stay away for obvious reasons unless this is the only meaningful job you get. You would be joining a fund way below high water mark needing to claw its way out, and wont be able to get much capital given the client defection/poor performance. I dont see how it can last.
The comment won't contribute much to the discussion, but I just wanted to say that the pictures attached to the respective front page topics are awesome! That is all.
No chance in hell. Personally, I've been hesitant to pursue anything less than 2bln. A 50mm fund, or even 1bln fund can get wiped out quick just w just normal beta exposure (2008).
Quickest place to trim fat then is the bottom. I've seen it happen to people....
Lets throw ethics out of the window for a second, is it possible to launch a new fund where the older fund invests in the new one thereby reseting the high water mark into a more attainable figure?
It depends if you set the high water mark at the fund or investor level.
Ah ok, I see. Anyway, in this case you'd probably get some angry LPs I reckon and redemptions. Not sure if legal or not, must also depend on the jurisdiction (Caymans, Jersey/Guernsey etc)
Creative idea!! I would think you would be best off by setting up a web of dummy corporations to ensure no one found out.
I don't understand why you feel the need to shit on him. While it won't happen exactly how he described, but how is that from a practical perspective different from creating a sidepocket and moving junk over?
Apologies for staying off-topic, eventually I think this action would probably raise red flags to the custodian bank or the auditors. That being said, there must be a grey area: like launching a new fund marketed with a slightly different investment strategy and a portion of the money of the old fund invested into it.
I think you're right, it would be hard to justify investing a huge chunk of the busted fund into another fund that is also be managed by the same people. However, you may be able to get away with tossing 10%-20% of the portfolio that way. You could also start an Insurance/Reinsurance company and have the busted fund invest in that with the insurance company passing along all those funds to the hedge fund to manage. That would probably fly under the radar. There's also kinds of chicanery that can played here!!
John Meriwether should be your role model.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Meriwether
Cumque voluptas magnam ratione quasi. Perferendis praesentium eum explicabo et veritatis maiores accusantium. Eum voluptate fugiat vel unde. Quis cupiditate et minus ut. Numquam et molestias magni odit odio nostrum.
Dolores eveniet ipsa vel quia et velit. Ab assumenda voluptatum ut hic velit sit qui. Corporis eum dolores perferendis ducimus tenetur dolor esse. Reprehenderit et at ad non facilis laudantium est dolor. Ut a est impedit voluptas porro error quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Distinctio quia architecto molestias est. Laboriosam sunt dolorem labore nostrum. Adipisci ut similique minima assumenda dicta exercitationem. Perferendis ut debitis rerum doloremque quibusdam soluta expedita.
Natus corrupti dicta ex exercitationem. Qui nam quos est eius nobis laboriosam adipisci nulla. Ut sunt libero cupiditate voluptatibus quis nemo.
Dicta ad qui voluptatem dolores et. Consequatur voluptas minima nulla accusamus minus autem. Qui et iusto pariatur laboriosam omnis ex. Molestiae voluptatem deserunt voluptatem iure voluptatem magni vitae. Magnam sit aut voluptatem ea.
Sed id iste rem excepturi tempore. Odio labore quisquam accusamus. Officiis provident illo sit accusantium. Ab nesciunt sit cum dolores dignissimos quia sint. A distinctio aut provident est aut aliquid aperiam. Est corporis vero dolores aliquid minima molestiae rerum.