IB MD is a job for LOSERS, not BSD’s
How many banking MDs do you know that are actually charisma chads? Me personally, none. Most of these guys are over-compensating dweebs who will bend over and submit to any client ask, no mater how ridiculous. It is laughably pathetic how little gumption or self assurance these guys have. When’s the last time you heard an MD say “no” to a client? MD behavior is sort of like Jonah Hill in Forgetting Sarah Marshall - basically your whole life is running around trying to get people to notice you and to “be there” for your clients, but no one actually gives a shit about anything you do - because you are a little advisor runt lol. For way too long I really thought that being a banking MD was the pinnacle of finance and prestige but how wrong I was. These are guys are not “experts in the space” - they are multiple time divorcees who couldn’t get into PE or any form of principal investing so they had to stay an advisor. Pour on the dislikes but you know deep down it to be true.
inb4 “advisory is more stable” inb4 “PE is banking 2.0” inb4 “FT Partners pays more than PE” inb4 “Natixis is more prestigious than PE/HF” inb4 “DJ Dumbass has WLB”
Bro’s talking like he is a neurosurgeon.
And wtf is BSD?
Bond, Stock, Derivative
Bangkok Securities Domain
Blood, Sweat, and DooDoo
Bloomberg, Sildenafil, Depreciation
Delete
Big Succulent Dick
LOL no one has same answer
Based Swedish Dildos
aka the fish dildo
Bald Sigma Daddies
People on this forum would rather be a 2 and out in PE that ends up in corp dev than a IB rainmaker who makes $15mm a year just because “they’re their clients’ bitch”. Idiot
I’d rather go to PE/HF and have a 1% chance of being a billionaire than to stay in banking and have a 100% chance of being an advisor bitch lol
If you genuinely think it's a 1% chance you need to go back to eating crayons.
If you wash out of PE in 2 years then you were never gonna be an IB rainmaker anyway
lol yeah because the street is just flooded with MDs pulling down 15mm+ yeah
Longer I've thought about it the more I see the appeal of BB banking if you can cut it...
$15 mm cash in hand at the end of the year with no personal risk to your capital... pretty nuts. Once you're senior enough in PE too you are a slave to people who give you money, always fighting for it vs. the 100 other GPs who also want it.
Yeah bro fuck we should have all stayed in IB to clip an easy $15m a year
Guys we got “inb4’d” now we can’t respond :(
Banking does fr suck tho
Natixis mentioned, this thread is getting censored soon.
Overly aggressive post, maybe, but I really can’t think of a job I’d want to do less than anything in banking above associate. The page-pushing kings of finance
not trying to glorify the (my) job but having worked at other finance jobs, I can assure you it gets a lot more admin/menial than banking lol
I think this is highly dependent on the bank you’re at. I’m at an EB, and although some of the MDs fit the description you’ve described, the majority (>50%) are worth looking up to.
Why do you think there's a difference?
Because good ones (who compete more off of quality experience) get paid big packages to come to EBs
Look if you sell a commoditized service, you have to compete on availability. If you don’t sell a commoditized service, you still have to be available, but you can set more boundaries. Some banking MDs sell a commoditized service, though many do not.
this is a good insight. i've experienced both. some MDs are sought after for their expertise in a space and their network of contacts. these MDs can set up much better boundaries on their clients/can pass along more of the bitch work to their team.
Commodity MDs who's only point of differentiation is client service, tend to have the bad lives and makes the lives of your team miserable.
If i were a banker again trying to make career out of it, I'd work for a differentiated MD. Better for your life AND career imo.
Eh the only MD I know is kind of a socially awkward guy
I would agree that most - though not all - MDs were middle of the pack kind of guys in their early / mid senior years. They just survived (i.e. kissed the right ass for years) to make MD and are now slaving away for clients. They probably missed out on great exits to stay in banking and be the client's bitches but at the end of the day IB is just a job, even for MDs.
it's just a job bro...
LOOOOOOL didnt read
You’re talking to the wrong guys. Got off the one with some MDs in SF.
They’ve got huge egos, do whatever tf they want. Have yachts and shit.
Fr cool ass guys
A good MD knows the industry- all companies in it and last couple decades of transactions- like the back of their hand. This is extremely valuable to clients who just don't have that. Not sure who you work for, but in my group we land multibillion dollar deals without pitches or going into pitches knowing we will win because our MDs are so well known across the industry.
Your point about PE makes little sense as well, if these firms are full of the best of banking, then why do they need to hire bankers for advice. And yes, part of hiring bankers is to run a process, but good senior bankers deliver great insights to clients and that's why some banks get paid so well. Sure, there are a number of MDs who are scrubs, but a good IB MD is worth a lot to clients. As with any overarching statement there is some truth and some untruth. Sorry that your MDs suck, hope you feel better about your bosses at the PE firm where you exit.
Of all of my friends and colleagues who left banking…. None of them have regretted it.
In all seriousness, I agree to an extent. A lot of MDs are dweebs and almost none of them are people I aspire to be. Everyone in the corporate world needs to answer to someone, but these guys are on another level in terms of being a slave to their clients.
I would admit that a lot of them are intelligent, speak very well, and know their space though. They all just seem very neurotic and unhappy.
I'm sure that you are absolutely Deloitted with your recruiting outcome
Guessing OP works at Baird and was unhappy with his bonus
OP: A verified restructuring banker
Prospect: 'You work for Deloitte haha'
Can't make this shit up lmao
Good point- read it at midnight, didn’t even look at the author’s title and I was just making a bad joke with the assumption that the someone was just trying to troll WSO
Deloitte is obviously not a bad place to work at, and any Big 4 accounting is an excellent job and it’s way better than what the majority of college students are able to achieve.
If anyone is offended, I fully apologize- the MS is well deserved
Until you realize that as an PE MD you have to kiss ass of the target's founder / executive management for a year or two to win a deal.
Look, the point of banking isn't personal satisfaction or changing the world. The point is you have a good, predictable paycheck if you're good at what you do, so you can spend it on strippers and bottle service. You guys got your priorities all wrong. Kids these days.
fuck being a Goldman Sachs MD aka a slave to clients, trucker is the way to go
if a lot of banking MDs are socially strange - with which I agree - that just creates a lot of white space for the charming MDs to crush it.
I hear you. My experience in IB was quite different. I would say there was a pretty strong 50/50 split between the socially awkward MD and the more charismatic, salesy MD. The majority of the MD’s were highly competent and thoroughly enjoyed the process of advising a client and the long-term relationships that came along with it. Another thing I observed was that you do not need to be super extroverted or gregarious in order to be an effective MD. That stereotype is just played up in Hollywood. Some of the highest producing MD’s at my firm were on the more introverted/reserved side of the spectrum.
I don’t know. For example, of the six banks I have worked with in the past year, exactly two MDs come to mind in terms of being actual BSDs that don’t just bend over and spread them for the client. That is in line with what I’d expect.
I would expect most senior bankers are mid. Think of what it takes to get to that level. You don’t need to be Bruce Wasserstein or anything like that. I would expect most MDs to just be a warm body and for a small number of MDs to actually be genuinely insightful and good at managing the client
Any job in 'sales' where you are competing over selling something is going to be this way. IB, advisory, services, IR, wherever. Directors bend over backwards for any and every client because 1: THEY are responsible for it, 2: THEY get paid the best for getting the client, and 3: YOU do all the work anyway.
Just a lowly SA going in FT next summer here. Call me crazy but this seems so bank/group dependent.
I'm not gonna so far as to say any MD in my group was a BSD (not because they aren't or are, but because why would you call another grown man by that term) but they weren't losers by any stretch and were very chill given the circumstances and stress around their job. From their work ethic to their personality, I definitely respect the senior ppl in my group but that's just me. Can't really generalize.
sounds like someone’s title got deferred again
maybe next year buddy
relax intern
This made me LOL. But yeah dude, most people working $1M+ jobs are dorks, not tik tok swag lords with broccoli haircuts who use terms like "charisma chad". High end lawyers, bankers, hedge funders, equity researchers, tech developers, etc. are in many cases extremely nerdy dudes. I'd argue Bankers are honestly the less socially awkward of the lot because at the end of the day it still takes good salesmanship.
You also fundamentally don't understand how the world works. If you think IB MDs are bitches for clients you've never seen a CEO bend over and take it up the ass from his board / majority shareholder and then still get fired after a transaction closes. Or a PE Fund manager have to suck ESG dick to impress potential LPs. Everyone is someone's bitch.
A fact of life. Amen.
largely agree but come on, we can't conflate broccoli heads with having any worthy charisma at all, on god
Frfr, no kizzy
no cap
Acting like most of these MF buyout PE principals aren’t soulless robots for the most part
I can't think of a single white-collar career path where you don't need to kiss someone's ass
If you want to be a sigma male, go be a pro athelete or a social media influencer
same coin different side, pro athletes are like slaves to the owners, if you don't perform for a a season you risk your contract not being extended or even terminated. If you don't play well, you are basically the coaches b*tch, or the fans will berate you mercilessly on social media. Also, every social media/ entertainment star always has a higher up they are being a b*tch to, whether that be brands, your agent, film studio executive, record label executive, the list goes on.
TBH, maturing is realising that in life you will always have to kiss ass, therefore, you just have to decide which ass is the best looking . (big pause).
yeah, unless ur last name is musk, tate, or bezos there really always is gonna be brown on your nose
skill issue
The real BSDs are the S&T MDs
As one of those dweebs, I’ll tell you that being a top person in PE vs IB, and coverage/product/S+T in IB require very different skill sets. And working for an A-hole or a great mentor is just as likely in IB as PE. But if you don’t respect the people you work for then find somewhere else to work. Build a career working with good people. Doesn’t matter the sector.
File this post away and take a look at it in 10 years.
Ehhh, I think at the highest level some MDs are BSDs.
I'm at a bank that is co-advisor with Goldman on a deal and they definitely walk around with a bigger dick than us / our MDs. This is an enormous deal and they basically said "we are getting this for our fee - you can either pay it or fuck off, we'll find other deals".
Once they're live and in agreement, sure, I imagine they do what they can to serve their client, but only after they've accepted a fee they are happy with (which is substantial... trust me).
They would be reamed by their fee committee if they did not push on the fees (and probably still were because outcome not good enough). It’s not a payment made for them as MD’s individually but GS as a firm, prior deals done, etc. Most MDs at GS are under massive pressure due to that title being fake / extra rung underneath the real prize (partner). Some junior MDs even make less than directors at other firms. Highly likely they do not feel like BSD’s
that will last maybe one more cycle. it only works if people think you provide a superior service / better talent. 20-30 years ago, GS unquestionably got the best guys, which is why boards love them. However, in the past ten years we’ve seen priorities shift on both sides. My mentor got a GS IB offer after a partner saw him playing rugby with his friends, loved how competitive he was, and offered him a job on the spot. That just would never happen today. If you look at those who made the firm an ivory tower institution, they are 1. almost all gone to other places and 2. very different people than the kinds they’re hiring now. I mean, look at MSD, how many juniors are ex goldman vs the number of ex gs seniors. that alone tells you enough. That’s why you see massive partner exoduses and junior walkouts — the culture isn’t uniform across the firm anymore. All that’s to say, when the next generation of board members who view GS as just another bank among EVR, CVP, Q, MS, PJT (in the case of capital structure advisory) come in, they’ll no longer be able to act like that without losing fees, because people know their service is just a commodity and is really no different than going to JPM.
tl;dr: you cant act complacent in sales forever, it’s a ticking time bomb.
Hey man don’t knock on IB just bc it wasn’t for you - I would recommend the job to most students in undergrad, but I also think IB is not for me
Analysts 5 seconds after signing their PE offer:
What is bro yapping about
Can't tell if this is a troll post or not. Real talk, buy side has always been venerated on this forum but as I have moved up in my career it has been illuminating to see the difference between how the kids on WSO think it is and how it really is.
For every first quartile GP out there, there is one other who is not killing it and two others who are really not killing it. I don't think people understand how PE actually works so let me break some of it down since I feel generous today:
1) Your entire net worth is tied up in carry that you had to buy with your W2 income, which is substantially less than your analogue in banking
2) If the fund you're managing is shit, you spend 5-10 years finding that out and another 3+ living in that reality, and the carry you bought in step 1 is *poof*
3) Every ~2 years+ you get to find out whether your employer will exist in the future when you go on the road to raise your funds. Nowadays it takes about 18 months to do that and for most managers, subscription numbers today are down, down, down. For some they are so existentially down that those managers won't get another fund, period. For those that do, the comp they earn for this fund (which is almost exclusively correlated with fund size), and which will take 10+ years to earn, will also be down.
4) Welp, just held final close on your fund which is down 50% from the last one you just finished investing, and now that the investment period is ticking it's time to put money out the door ASAP before the LPs start chewing your ass out (they just don't know you're a chad). Better hope you have some good personal connections that others don't so you can get you some of that legendary, non-intermediated, proprietary deal flow that clears hurdle and catch-up EZPZ. Otherwise, you'll have to grind through the week and weekend to finesse an LBO before submitting a binding offer alongside 20 competitor firms for this company being sold by this little advisor runt. "He's not even a charisma chad like me, but I have to maintain a good relationship with him so that I can get a credible shot at the auction process..."
5) Turns out you had to overpay for the company in the agented process after all, and deep down under it all you know it's because the vast majority of you and your brethren on the buy side are just glorified toll booth guards manning the gate to private capitalism. The notion of alpha is laughable, because most of you are just crabs in a bucket trying unimaginatively to lever the same widget co with the same bank debt and roll it up into the same uninspired investment platform. You enjoy exiting the platform a decade later at a 1.2x, which pisses off your LPs and also fails to clear your waterfall. It's an even bigger problem, because with this being done it's now definite that you owe clawback under the American waterfall that financed your condo a few years back. Time to have fun haggling with your pissed off LPs, to whom you owe money, and deadbeat former partners who refuse to pay back their share gross of tax.
6) Day in day out, you get to do chad things like getting reamed in the ass at investment committee in full view of your peers by the boomer founder trio, whose antiquated notions about investing, unchecked personal failings and murky succession plan are a daily reminder of what a charisma chad you are.
Et repellat eum tenetur voluptate doloribus atque occaecati. Necessitatibus animi aliquid alias. Non sunt voluptas odit doloremque. Voluptate tenetur rerum esse labore vel.
Recusandae voluptatibus quia qui illo dolores maxime neque. Dolorem dicta assumenda similique odit omnis dolores esse quia.
Eum sint rerum eum nobis dolores quis qui minus. Eligendi sequi ullam eveniet in autem. Atque atque quia eos corporis. Ipsum neque beatae rerum eum. Deleniti quibusdam vel dolore consequatur quia natus enim.
Sit deserunt ex natus vel quidem quia et consequatur. Facilis quidem illum debitis ut. Harum fugiat aut id sequi ipsam incidunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quod nihil qui et et autem. Blanditiis odio ratione ratione eum. Voluptatem voluptas ea temporibus facere nemo earum quam. Quam tempore libero totam et laudantium doloremque. Et sequi consequatur ut id eum et unde iure.
Ratione sit dolores sit minima quasi delectus dolorum. Maxime omnis dolor iusto tempora et dolores. Qui quisquam neque est ab. Fuga cum est nobis beatae nam officiis voluptas voluptas.
Et doloribus quod ut magni molestiae eos perferendis necessitatibus. Inventore aliquam sunt facere nobis fugit adipisci tempore expedita.
Omnis placeat occaecati distinctio eius temporibus consectetur asperiores est. In dolorem qui corporis quis nobis. Omnis veritatis impedit non quia. Tempora illum quaerat et.
Quis quae pariatur quas culpa. Officia voluptas quia enim ad ut. Eligendi dolorem accusantium pariatur sit nihil id dolorem voluptas. Ratione ab numquam nihil explicabo distinctio. Quia accusantium aut et nemo libero esse itaque.
Nihil at sed velit quidem ex quam. Sed aliquid nam sed rerum eius non. Beatae omnis eum quod qui porro blanditiis. Quis dolorum unde in molestiae at odio.
Illum velit totam nobis aspernatur et sed. Voluptas ab vitae perferendis laboriosam officiis suscipit praesentium. Ab ut qui molestiae. Soluta qui quo aut tempora sit commodi. Accusamus qui sint et sapiente aut.
Vitae eos magnam in quidem voluptatem quidem. Modi nihil aspernatur est consequatur quia vero ut veritatis. Quos ab fuga quia aut. Provident quasi itaque laborum et consequatur voluptas. At quae culpa est modi incidunt sint similique nulla. Ut adipisci quo et.
Quis ut corrupti id quia eos. Animi consequatur ipsam vel perspiciatis et ut adipisci aut. Dolor eos ipsa totam ipsa. Aut exercitationem sit omnis dolorem omnis doloremque. Et qui suscipit quisquam. Aut quos hic quis saepe enim.