London - Recruiting/HH firms Naming and Shaming

Please share here the recruiting firms that need to be avoided at all costs. Here's my top 3:

-Mawney Partners (the name is a red flag in itself).

-Selby Jennings: Fraudsters.

-Goodman Masson: Biggest time-wasters in the game (says it all really).

Share more details to help us steer clear of scams. 

 

Oh, you've got quite a list there! It's always good to be cautious when dealing with headhunters. Here are some insights based on the most helpful WSO content:

  • Mawney Partners: I don't have any specific information on them, but if you've had a bad experience, it's good to be wary.
  • Selby Jennings: There have been mentions of them blasting your resume to the wrong groups and offering low ball compensation. Not the best practice, eh?
  • Goodman Masson: I don't have any specific details on them from the WSO threads, but if they've wasted your time, it's best to steer clear.

Remember, always go with a high-quality, established recruiter that can actually place people into the types of roles they want. If a recruiter can't even tell you straight up the last time they placed a person or the firm they went to, it's time to look elsewhere.

And hey, while you're at it, you could probably also brush up on some areas of your recruiting pitch or your interview skills. It never hurts to be over-prepared!

Sources: PSA: Nightmare HH Experience, Brian Jennings - Avoid this Recruiter!, Firms to avoid, Awful Headhunters to Avoid, Watch out while recruiting: Office Hours Are A HUGE Scam

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Found 90% to be completely useless. Completely agree on Selby / Goodman Masson.

Adding to the list:

Pinpoint / Waterstreet - absolute jokemen, think this is just a pyramid scheme

Dartmouth - pretty hit and miss, prefer to avoid. staffed entirely by children

Greenwich Partners - seems to just be one matey there lol and he is completely useless

Arkesden - extremely unresponsive, do they even do anything anymore?

One Search (infra specific) - clowns, have used them as a search firm for us too and atrocious candidate selection, 0 thought

Metis Search - also crap

Some GOOD firms are Altus and Curzon.

 

Hey - how do you explain the fact that OneSearch is mandated by a big portion of the UMM/MF infra funds? Don't get me wrong, I agree with your assessment. It is equally applicable to Darmouth or Arkesden, I can't get my head around how they manage to secure those mandates.
Greenwich Partners, one man gig who is totally useless and send you generic emails with typos and zero relevance with skills or current role. 
Also agree with Curzon, they placed me in my current shop and I have nothing to say on how they handled the whole process.

 

Brock & Decker - they take your CV and send it to everyone without asking permission. Unbelievable. Though it looks like this particular HH left for whatever reason shortly after I complained about him and made it a big deal. Incredibly unprofessional.

I've actually had good experience with some names mentioned like Dartmouth and Greenwich. They've delivered a few times.

 

Same experience with Albert Cliff (I think the same owners as Brock & Decker). One idi** headhunter from them sent my CV to MY FKIN boss to „confirm“ and I wasn’t even interviewing yet nor did I had any offers, which could justify the confirmation of my CV data. I was enraged as shit and threatened to sue their asses and apparently this fkin guy got laid off as a result. Thank god.

And thank god nothing happened to my current job as my boss was somehow cool with it. But was a very awkward situation.

 
Most Helpful

Blackwood: are these guys doing anything these days? They've been totally useless in my experience, their PE recruiters ghosted me while their IBD team kept asking me about banking roles (despite me saying I wasn't interested in sell-side moves). Plus they used to reach out all the time when I was in banking to ask for updates on people / team structure / etc (in a somehow creepy way).

Asset Partners: allegedly they have good roles, was intro-ed to them by a friend but they had a terrible attitude and were quite disorganised (may have something to do with team size, think it's just the founder and a principal). Have the gut feeling they are very focused on female candidates - all my female friends had at least some traction with them, but my boys none.

I have to give a little shout-out to Dartmouth. When I was transitioning to PE they came forward with a few good roles and were very professional. Comment above on them being a hit or miss is true - but if you pick the right person they can be very useful in my experience.

 

Speaking of Dartmouth. Had a call with them this week and it was a joke ... Role suggested totally irrelevant despite mentioning to them previously what I was after, wrong seniority, the consultant knew nothing about the role and you could tell he was just reading a memo in front of him. Started to call me 'my friend' and talking like we were buddies since kindergarden. Despite not being particularly interested, he was keen to submit my CV.

Wondering whether this is across all assignments, from junior to senior roles. If so, pretty concerning.  

 

They are incentivised on sharing CV (they literally get paid per CV shown to client). So even if you're not interested he still makes some beer money

 

Walker Hamill: completely unresponsive

Waterman Stearn: completely unresponsive

Octavius: not necessarily lots of pure PE (mostly special sits and all sorts of hedge funds)... but staffed mostly by recent grads who have no idea what they're doing and act like they have a mandate when in reality they are just opportunistically blasting your resume to random funds that sound good. Even the more senior headhunters are completely disorganized and peddling fake mandates... unclear how they are in business.

 

Walker Hamill and Brock & Decker are literally the worst I have been dealing with. The former will send you emails / call you about roles and be completely unresponsive. Meaning, they never schedule a meeting to discuss about opps, just name drop and they are extremely sassy and unprofessional. The latter will just throw your CV at every opportunity they have and pressure you into applying to £500m infra funds telling you you absolutely need to do this process because nothing else will ever come up in the market (from top BB team). They are odious people to even talk to and will never bring you a qualitative opportunity anyways so not worth interacting with.

 

I think they are decent and run good mandates. An MD I know in a large platform said his team likes them and have good results. Having said that, the usual HH issues still apply. Their priority is filling spots so they do present opportunities accordingly, might keep you out of popular processes or steer you to other less popular ones so they can place more candidates/fill more spots etc.

 

Rerum deserunt error distinctio itaque. Voluptate rerum ut doloremque aut nulla totam.

Sapiente dolores quisquam quam ut rerum nam. Et est vel id voluptatem voluptatem necessitatibus.

Voluptate officia libero praesentium explicabo molestias quasi. Et cupiditate iusto consectetur et vel quidem recusandae dolores. Voluptatibus ullam eos modi vel labore ipsa et est. Id quis dolorum itaque dolorem. Quis in officia amet placeat harum excepturi.

 

Rem asperiores ad voluptas nobis dolor sunt veritatis. Omnis et dolorem molestias consectetur molestias aut. Iste iure rerum est soluta autem distinctio.

Sed amet facilis dolor et dolores earum consequatur. Molestias et maxime rerum sit aliquid aut sunt. Sit ratione natus maxime est.

Voluptatem qui tenetur omnis soluta. Excepturi quisquam magnam velit. Culpa ratione et praesentium.

Doloremque et dolores quia sapiente. Deleniti ut et voluptatem et. Rerum ratione rerum aperiam qui dolor repudiandae vel. Et non iusto unde aliquid. Quia consequatur velit dolorem officia natus amet.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”