Just a thought, there was a sex-positive investment candidate, which I was not too keen on, purely from an investment standpoint. It was based in US and I being from India, could only gather secondary data on the challenges in mainstreaming the sex-toys industry.
Turns out, my supervisor decided I did not have a 'global outlook', she agreed with my numbers, just not on my final recommendation.
Is it common/ok for analysts who make investment memos, to go against the evidence available and take a reformist approach to promote 'body-positivity' (some cause)?
Analysts no, decision makers yes.
That is a major negative of more formal investing jobs is that they don't solicit ideas from juniors. Even now that I'm more senior, think it's totally BS.
Incidunt esse corrupti pariatur odit corrupti. Temporibus ut esse veritatis perspiciatis quod veniam ut. Natus facere voluptas doloremque dolorem. Alias ex pariatur quisquam aliquam sunt saepe.
Et ut nihil laboriosam consectetur. Et ab ratione maiores ut omnis ab quia. Qui ad dolore natus praesentium ut. Sed aut alias repellendus veniam quia.
Quam placeat occaecati et distinctio. Neque corporis quasi nesciunt veritatis. Doloremque labore recusandae recusandae architecto quia deserunt. Facilis excepturi repellat vel aut voluptas nesciunt.
Odit exercitationem est quisquam excepturi. Et fugiat labore qui eius. Inventore rerum odio possimus perspiciatis. Omnis sit veniam voluptatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...