PE Recruiting From BB FIG

I know there are some posts already about this, but some are outdated and few do not have many responses. How is PE recruiting from mid-tier BB's these days (think Citi, Barcap, BAML)? I understand that historically FIG pigeonholes you thus making your opportunities somewhat limited, but has that changed?

FIG has many sub-verticals, so I know this can vary depending on your deal experience, but for the most part how are your chances of getting MM/UMM generalist looks? Again, not talking about coming from GS/JPM.

Thanks in advance.

 

if you have good pedigree you can make anything happen. if average pedigree, can still hustle to make it happen but would try to get into a vertical that does more work with "ebitda businesses" which will result in you getting more conventional experience vs more capital intensive lending/insurance verticals. so think fintech, insurance brokerage, asset management, etc. in any event you won't be totally pigeonholed if you don't want to be, but you can better position yourself on the margins by trying to avoid covering banks and insurance carriers

that being said, it's also worth mentioning the value of pigeonholing especially considering the increasing presence of megafunds and UMMs in FIG. so killing it at one of those banks and going to, e.g., Apollo FIG or hybrid value is sort of a "side door" to some of these top tier platforms that are typically suuuper selective for the traditional PE roles but value FIG experience highly for the financial services focused investing roles (which are increasing).

 

Appreciate the response. I understand that being in verticals like insurance brokerage and fintech give you more opportunities as those businesses are EBITDA driven. In terms of approaching HH's, will I get less opportunities if I say that I am interested in a generalist role rather than saying I want to specialize in FIG? Just curious about how to open as many doors as possible through HH's.

Can't say for sure I want to do FIG PE or not as of now - I'm sure I'll develop some conviction as I start my FT gig.

 
Most Helpful

if i were you id decide if you were at all interested in fig pe or not first (like try to figure this out now basically by reading about the top firms). and then id position yourself accordingly. i think you have to be honest with them about your interests but not so honest that you seem open to anything. i think positioning yourself (Assuming you dont want to lock out generalist opportunities or fig opportunities but aren't dead set on fig) is to just say, look, i know my background aligns with fig and while im not certain i want to be a lifelong fig guy, im more than happy to look at those opps on a firm by firm basis, but im most interested in [middle market buyout] strategies with a more generalist industry focus. the worst thing you can convey is you have no clue what you want, but i think this approach leaves doors open and shows you know what you're talking about a bit. and at the end of the day, every fig analyst is going to get a look for the fig pe roles because it's just such a small pool to choose from so wouldnt worry about missing out on those

 

yes absolutely. fig experience is valued above all else in fig investing. i've seen people go from pretty bad LMM/MM banks covering fig to top tier MFs because they were total rockstars, got great deal experience, and had great academic pedigree. i think all else equal doing the same from industrials is going to be a lot harder generally

 

usually the cases have actually been fairly generalist in my experience. like an ebitda financial services business lbo. fig verticals are each quite unique so it would be tough to come up with a standardized case that would be accessible for all fig people for example. the indsutry stuff is nuanced but can be learned. case studies are testing for basic analytic ability and time management more than anything else

 

Alias nemo reprehenderit harum culpa. Perspiciatis quisquam cum sed sed. Dolorum ex maiores omnis recusandae. Sint quidem corporis cumque eaque.

Voluptas optio qui eaque et autem quas ex. Et sit id voluptate quam accusantium explicabo quis. Dolorem praesentium et qui laudantium ut omnis natus. Et commodi iure dolor ab ut consequatur assumenda.

Omnis vel quis optio iure aliquid vel. Omnis sequi ut culpa et voluptas magni et. Nihil non sapiente temporibus temporibus enim id et vitae. Voluptatem quia eaque iure dolores modi velit. Dignissimos repellat illum nobis rem atque distinctio consequuntur. Totam blanditiis quia incidunt.

Ratione consectetur et officiis eaque quis sequi laborum. Accusantium quis vel odit est repellat. Mollitia ex quis sed rerum. Consequatur ipsa quia est dolores facilis qui perspiciatis aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”