It's possible. You either have to be brilliant, or put the hours in the lab. Lot's of hours...

"Cut the burger into thirds, place it on the fries, roll one up homey..." - Epic Meal Time
 

If you did well on your SAT you won't need to study hundreds of hours to get over 700. People that are good test takers can probably score over 700 without studying at all. If you're doing investment banking, you can probably already score very well on the quantitative section.

I suspect that the verbal section is where people do poorly. You need to be able to read carefully (but quickly) and make logical inferences based on a fact scenario. You also need to remember high school grammar - the sentence correction questions are pretty nitpicky.

I took the LSAT in the late 1990s, so I assume that had to help me when I took the GMAT. The GMAT is really only two 75-minute sections plus two essays. You just have to learn to manage your time and stay focused.

 

Since you've already taken a practice test, you should already have a feel for what the test is like, now as long as you study for 2-3 hours/day for a good month or two, you'll be fine.

But once you get actual test day, staying focused is the key.

 

I took it cold no practice got a 660. (destroyed the verbal, was so-so on the math).

Brushed up on some of the math that I hadn't used in forever (geometry rules and stuff). Took one online full practice exam and a few paper math sections over maybe 2-3 months. Got a 710 on the real deal.

Should be fine. Definitely take at least one of the practice computer based tests, because they are different than paper tests and it is good to be familiar with how it will be on the test day.

one other reminder, the GMAT is only valid for 5 years. So don't take it too early in case you end up working for more than a few years. and then you will have to retake the damn thing.

good luck

 

here's what i did...came back from spring break senior year and realized i had signed up for the gmat for the week after...went and bought a princeton review study guide...took the 4 practice tests they provide, one per day on mon-thur of that week, took a break on friday, and took the real test on saturday...i ended up breaking upper 1% (which was 730 at the time)...and i did so-so on the SATs (upper 1400s).. basically what i learned from my experience is that this is not a test you can really "study" for in the normal sense...the best you can do is get a good feel for the format of the test, so you can manipulate everything else to your benefit...like knowing how to distribute the time u spend on the various sections, which i think is most important...

 
Best Response

I took it a couple years ago and studied the quant section thoroughly. The verbal, to me at least, was very easy, but I've always been fortunate with standardized test verbal sections and so I think I'm an outlier in that respect.
I went about studying the archetypical quant questions (many of which were trig and geometry based, but also some other recurring themes) using a combination of the Kaplan and Princeton Review books, as well as the practice tests available through the GMAC. Practice test scores ranged from 660 - 760 (PR practice tests were always a little easier), and I ended up with 740 on the real thing, or 98th percentile, I believe. I found the GMAC practice tests to be the best predictors of my actual scores, as they both came in at 720. Agree with above poster that you absolutely should take computer tests, as the test adjusts to your performance as you take it, plus it just helps to be familiar with the interface. Anyway, the keys for me were learning to discipline myself on managing my time and learning the algorithms to solve the math problems. If I had neither studied nor practiced, I definitely would have gotten a lower score, no question. Granted, I had been out of undergrad for several years at the time and haven't been used to rote math problems or having to recall esoteric theorems, and so it helped to have a refresher. All in all, I spent maybe three or four weeks studying, but that was off-on as I juggled it with work.

Once more into the breach, dear friends.
 
Indeed:
The verbal, to me at least, was very easy, but I've always been fortunate with standardized test verbal sections and so I think I'm an outlier in that respect.

Verbal was easy for me as well (97%) but im no verbal genius. 650 verbal SAT's and 157 on LSAT, which somehow translates into 97% on the GMAT. Probably the most important thing, unfortunately, is whether you are a native english speaker.

 

Not sure about you all, but I did not feel like I had nearly enough time to study for the math section. the math was nothing like the math I do as an analyst. Anyways, i suck at testing and had a very hard time getting through the questions in time. I ended up with a 640 (90% verbal 65% math..I think) after studying pretty hard for two months when I had time (usually a 5 to 8 hours a week). I'm suprised to see that some people here think that getting a 700 or higher is easy. I guess I'm just not as smart, but I feel like the work I do as an analyst does not require someone to be brilliant. my $.02

 

i took no classes just did alot of practice and got a 750 on the first try, don't waste $ and more importantly time with classes

 

Sequi quas autem incidunt fugiat recusandae. Repudiandae qui velit enim laboriosam. Nihil quidem fugiat dolore nostrum ex accusamus velit aut. Soluta aut voluptates amet omnis est totam neque et. Hic quisquam ratione nostrum sed quia dolore molestiae. Aperiam sunt impedit est enim. Deserunt aut animi voluptas qui aut.

Accusamus libero dolores et ut a veritatis. Dolor repellat dignissimos quisquam dicta quia. Est quo laudantium fugit necessitatibus pariatur rem. Corporis dolorum amet quia sunt sit rerum.

Reiciendis alias nihil temporibus soluta in. Ut est et nobis quas molestiae excepturi. Autem dicta quis animi rerum quibusdam architecto. Quasi voluptatem itaque quasi corrupti. Dolorum tenetur sapiente veniam earum rerum rerum. Deleniti molestiae explicabo est aut sit. Temporibus nihil et temporibus magnam at maiores maiores ipsum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”