tapering and currency depreciation
It seems that the currency of many countries in asia like india rupee has depreciated because of Fed's tapering statement recently, can someone explain why is that? Thanks!
It seems that the currency of many countries in asia like india rupee has depreciated because of Fed's tapering statement recently, can someone explain why is that? Thanks!
+13 | Delta One Trading | 6 | 9h | |
+12 | Lateraling from Trading to IB vs. IB to Trading | 4 | 2d | |
+11 | Loser on the trading floor - help please! | 3 | 2d | |
+9 | Best macro desks | 2 | 4s | |
+9 | AVP / AD Fixed Income Trader Salary | 1 | 3d | |
+9 | SA class size in BB FO (IB, S&T, AM PB) | 3 | 1d | |
+5 | Rest in Peace Jim Simons | 0 | 10h | |
+4 | Understanding the Yield Curve | 2 | 5d | |
+3 | What NOT To DO in S&T and Banking | 3 | 4d | |
+2 | How Quantitative is Commodity Trading | 2 | 6s |
Career Resources
asian currencies such as the INR are considered risk currencies as the fed tapers, risk assets will see an overall sell-off (equities, commodities, EM currencies, etc)
can you explain what do you mean by risk currencies?
Bump
U.S. is the best credit risk available (questionable but just go with it) thus pays the lowest interest rate-> tapering causes rate to go up-> other countries rates go up as a result-> weakens foreign economy-> less appealing foreign investments-> foreign investments are sold-> foreign currency is converted out of -> foreign currency depreciates...but I could be wrong
Thanks! but I still have two small questions, one is that why other countries rates go up-> weakens foreign economy, and two, since the rates in US also goes up, wouldn't that lead to the deprecation of dollar, which offset the result of depreciation of foreign currencies like rupee? Please inform.
.
Ya got me boss, too bad I didn't make the clarifying statement that I could be wrong.... just kidding, I did. Fwiw though, I dont see why your theory would hold if the other country's rates rose as well.
U really shouldnt be laughing "big dog" because while higher rates do generally draw in capital, many emerging markets including India are also supported by equity flows which flee higher rates. This is one of the reasons EM rate hikes don't always work to protect currencies...indeed India hiked on day 1 of this crisis and USDINR ended the day up 2%ish. So no need to insult this guy when a) he said he wasnt sure and b) you werent even right in your response.
And no one has the "correct" answer for why taper-talk caused such an EM meltdown...there are many reasons why it has gotten so ugly and there is no one right reason.
if US rates go up, the yield on foreign investments is less attractive compared to safer ones (so currency depreciates). places like india have shitty options... raise interest rates to protect currency? hurt economy. dont do that? rupee goes to shit
Carry becoming less attractive is a signal which creates an incentive for the mkt participants to get out of EM. For some places where positions are large and idiosyncratic issues are present (e.g. INR, IDR, BRL), this ends up resembling shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theatre.
Thanks!
Thank you!
It's actually a mixture of reasons:
Excess liquidity that has been a result of QE has been pumped into higher yielding assets (EM). Once that Liquidity detox starts to take place, there is a natural pull back of risk assets, EM suffers, and the ccy depreciates
Normalising of USD rates will cause the reversal of EM money to the the US.
I don't have to energy to argue this right now. Interest rates strictly carry more clout than equity flows (see A History of Interest Rates, Homer/Sylla). I appreciate you trying to be a hero, though. In any event, I do agree there are many reasons as to why there is a meltdown in EM.
u r using a DM framework to analyze EM markets...wjhen vol picks up EM currencies always follow the equity flow not the rate differentials. I am not "trying to be a hero" i just have actual experience trading EM markets unlike you.
Yep. EM's trade categorically differently than DM markets...it would make sense that they follow equity flows rather than bond flows, since both are considered "risk assets" by most influential pools of capital today.
Earum in qui nam quia numquam rerum quasi. Magni voluptatem in qui vel. Iste blanditiis illum repellendus est quis rem qui vel. Sunt et ea saepe numquam voluptas. Est quam qui alias magni iure.
Dolor laudantium praesentium et eveniet fugiat laudantium eveniet. Facilis atque consectetur aut voluptas fuga totam. Eligendi consequuntur at labore animi. Nihil praesentium et sunt voluptatem eum placeat. Nesciunt consectetur ut suscipit eos.
Soluta esse iste aliquam voluptas a aperiam. Soluta quas consequatur possimus dignissimos dicta. Facere non sed labore. Deserunt maiores nesciunt esse enim fugiat sapiente.
Aut laboriosam unde cupiditate provident soluta quisquam et. Et nam consequuntur quos occaecati commodi illum maxime. Eveniet nemo non maxime. Unde necessitatibus non et id dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...