Green Budgeting

Using tools of budgetary policymaking to help achieve climate and environmental goals.

Author: Kevin Henderson
Kevin Henderson
Kevin Henderson
Private Equity | Corporate Finance

Kevin is currently the Head of Execution and a Vice President at Ion Pacific, a merchant bank and asset manager based Hong Kong that invests in the technology sector globally. Prior to joining Ion Pacific, Kevin was a Vice President at Accordion Partners, a consulting firm that works with management teams at portfolio companies of leading private equity firms.

Previously, he was an Associate in the Power, Energy, and Infrastructure Investment Banking group at Lazard in New York where he completed numerous M&A transactions and advised corporate clients on a range of financial and strategic issues. Kevin began his career in corporate finance roles at Enbridge Inc. in Canada. During his time at Enbridge Kevin worked across the finance function gaining experience in treasury, corporate planning, and investor relations.

Kevin holds an MBA from Harvard Business School, a Bachelor of Commerce Degree from Queen's University and is a CFA Charterholder.

Reviewed By: Christopher Haynes
Christopher Haynes
Christopher Haynes
Asset Management | Investment Banking

Chris currently works as an investment associate with Ascension Ventures, a strategic healthcare venture fund that invests on behalf of thirteen of the nation's leading health systems with $88 billion in combined operating revenue. Previously, Chris served as an investment analyst with New Holland Capital, a hedge fund-of-funds asset management firm with $20 billion under management, and as an investment banking analyst in SunTrust Robinson Humphrey's Financial Sponsor Group.

Chris graduated Magna Cum Laude from the University of Florida with a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and earned a Master of Finance (MSF) from the Olin School of Business at Washington University in St. Louis.

Last Updated:November 2, 2023

What Is Green Budgeting?

Green budgeting involves using budgetary and policy-making tools to achieve environmental and climate change goals. It entails an approach ensuring coherence. It includes alignment of budgetary design, framework, and implementation for green-sensitive budgeting.

These include the budgetary processes. Also, it has fiscal consolidations along with its planning and appraisal. This budgeting has relevant implications for environmental damage and recovery. It is in national needs and issues. Also, taking global environmental costs and imputations into account.

The core challenges remain in the estimation and valuation of the damages. It offers a balance between industrial and economic activities with sustainability. 

This Budgeting framework comprises a self-regulatory and imposing model. It raises various measures through environmental implementations, programs, and actions. Some quintessential is the Paris AgreementAichi Biodiversity Targets, and Sustainable Development Goals. 

Among the various aspects of the entire budgeting process. There are various perspectives on the unseen. The two aspects are feminine aspects and environmental issues. These are the crucial aspects of the science of public economics.

The fundamental aspects of this budgeting dwell. The concepts are quite undefined, remaining exploratory in nature. The evidence-based approach provides a foundation for the budgeting framework. It has established a model structure based on four pillars, which are as follows:

  1. Framework
  2. Tools 
  3. Report 
  4. Governance.

The basis of evaluation involves action, response, and a creation-based structural framework. It provides adequate tools. These are reporting, accountability, and ensuring a form of governance. 

The problem creating an interest in the dwell of public finance is the no a set framework. This established no compulsion. It is set across nations' boundaries into mother nature issues relevant to all.         

Green Budgeting challenges

A few of the challenges are:

1. Identification

The identification of the target areas remains a tricky aspect. This is the identification of fossil fuel emissions. It brings in more subsidies for their usage and emissions to put into regulation. IMF's estimates reveal fossil fuel subsidies are 6.8 percent in 2020, to rise by 7.4 percent of GDP by 2025. 

2. Management and assessment

The aspects remain confounded with managerial and assessment aspects. To make the budget more compatible with environment-friendly issues. Few nations adopt a particular section of spending by monitoring revenue aspects.

The countries use the tool of budgeting for climate mitigation. It also acts as a means of biodiversity and landscape protection.

The core aspects of developing this budgeting are as the following:

  1. Budget Alignments with environmental issues and emissions issues.
  2. Monetary and Fiscal Policy tools implementation process and measurement of their impact.
  3. Further improvement by identification of research gaps and scope of providing adequate data.
  4. Policy design and testing, as well as building the piloting process.
  5. Collaborations, debates, and discussions among intra-national and international parties.

Apart from that, the core challenges in the implementation of the framework are as follows:

  1. There is a lack of one size fits all structural framework adopted. This implies every country develops its structure. It is according to its prevalent financial management framework.
  2. It can't be stand-alone policies. It doesn't change existing policies or create its own structure. Yet, it creates an environment for better understanding for decision-makers. Its focus is more on bringing the evidence together. This is in a systematic and coordinated manner.

Some of the initiatives are:

1. Paris Collaboration

The OECD  Paris Collaborative on Green Budgeting on 12th December 2017. The purpose revolved around the fulfillment of environmental goals in the budgeting process.  

2. IPAC or International Programme for action on climate

It emphasized the creation of a global structure. The collaborative framework of actions on climate change and various environmental issues. It focused on bringing zero-emission and achieving the targets by 2050.

Framework of Green Responsive Budgeting

The budgeting process involves the following:

  1. Division
  2. Allocation 
  3. Segregation 
  4. Creation.  

In light of the need for building cohesive social actions on sustainability. This budgeting has various interpretations across economies.

The national budgets play a crucial role in prioritizing and allocating resources. Green Budgeting is a form of outcome-based budgeting. It forms linkages among decisions, policies, and actions or initiatives. 

The fundamental parameters evaluated on the grounds of green-sensitive budgeting: 

  1. It is the usage of budgetary policy-making tools and mechanisms. The purpose is to achieve environmental and climate goals.
  2. This includes evaluating the impact on the environment. It is due to various budgetary implications as well as fiscal consolidations.
  3. It demonstrates the inclusion of assessment of the aspects of the budget. It covers environmental issues for achieving national and international commitments.
  4. The green budgeting process consists of various environmental parametric aspects and challenges. 

The concept is quite contemporary. It brought to cover the emphasis on environmental concerns.

Reasons for Creating A Green Budget

The various reasons for the creation of this budgeting are as follows:

  1. Climate Change: Industrial and economic activities have led to environmental degradation. The repercussions on the environment have been severe. These include temperature change, ozone depletion, melting of glaciers, etc.
  2. Biodiversity Loss: Unplanned industrialization has led to the extinction of species.
  3. Environmental degradation: Deforestation and urbanization have created a depletion of biodiversity. 

The response mechanism developed has various challenges. The green responsive budgeting has lacked one cohesive structure of an implementation. Also, there is no method of action. 

Budgets have a significant, centralized role in prioritizing and resourcing government action. They can have a substantial impact on progress towards these objectives.

To understand green budgeting for environmental recovery. It's crucial to dwell on the four key reinforcing building blocks:

  1. A strong strategic framework with clear linkages between environment and strategic climate priorities.
  2. Tools for evidence generation and policy coherence. This is to gather evidence on the impact of budget measures.
  3. Reporting to ease accountability and transparency. Thus, easing scrutiny of the quality and impact of green budgeting.
  4. An enabling budgetary governance framework to sustain a green budgeting framework over time.

Green Budgeting Evaluation

The imputations and calculations offer an evaluative approach. It is on the various indicators of analysis. It brings the foundation of parametric assessments. 

Here are the steps for conducting an evaluation of Green Budgeting:

  1. Monitoring greenhouse gas emissions and nationally determined contributions: Percentage, annual difference, emission structure and intensities, emission intensities per unit of GDP, and emission by sources and fuel combustion.
  2. Assessment of impacts and risks: Annual temperature change, Indicators of development include various deaths due to socio-economic inequality and the number of missing persons.
  3. The scope of actions and opportunities includes the various sources of energy production and making alternative evaluative arrangements. 

The Parameters of Evaluation are as follows:

  1. Energy mix in total energy supply
  2. The energy mix in electricity production
  3. Effective carbon rates
  4. Climate-related tax revenue as a percentage of GDP
  5. Research and development budgets of renewable alternative energy sources
  6. Patent applications in supportive climate technologies
  7. The various development indicators are inclusive of expenditure and finance. They are climate development aspects and climate-related revenue. This is as a percentage of tax revenue.

This methodology is designed to navigate the transition to a low-carbon, resilient economy.

  1. Level 1: The climate-positive revenue-raising measures and expenditure only.
  2. Level 2: The climate-positive and negative revenue-raising measures and incorporating other environmental objectives.
  3. Level 3: This covers all environmental objectives, including climate, on a positive and negative basis, incorporating tax expenditures. 

Important Facts

  • Climate change budgeting tagging is a government-led process of identifying, measuring, and monitoring climate-relevant expenditures.
  • The current carbon budget to remain within 1.5 degrees Celsius of global warming with a 66 percent probability is given as 400 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide from the start of 2020. With the world population of 8 billion people within the next few years, it is 50 tonnes per person.

Case Study: Green budgeting in India 2022 - 23

The key evaluative factors of India's Union budget 2022 - 23 provide a case study of the budgeting process.

The Overseas Development Institute estimates India could lose three to ten percent of its GDP annually by 2100 due to climate change.

The major findings on environmental losses imputed economically, globally, and for India: 

  1. The United Nations Environment Programme forewarns. It states a rise of global temperature by 3 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. This economically imputes a loss of 10 percent to the global economy by 2050. 
  2. Further, when brought to Indian and Asian contexts. It is stated the region is most vulnerable to climate change. The World Bank reiterates this on the grounds of reports. The finding states annual economic losses in the region due to climate change to be USD 160 billion by 2030. 

 According to the India Union Budget 2022-23, India has set three primary goals to combat climate change.

  1.   To reduce the emission intensity of the economy.
  2.   To increase the non-fossil-based component of electric power
  3.  To expand the carbon sink from forest and tree cover

It brought a stratification of the economy in the following ways:

  1. The Union Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change (MOEFCC) have postulated an estimated expenditure of three thousand thirty crores INR compared to two thousand twenty crores INR in FY 2021 – 22.
  2. The emphasis on electrical vehicle policy in the budget.
  3. The budget focused on 'clean energy and 'mindful utilization rather than mindless consumption.
  4. Renewable energy allocation: The estimations from the Union Ministry of New and Renewable Energy postulated India's renewable energy targets. It demonstrated a decrease marginally from Rs 7,681.80 crore to Rs 6,900.68 crore. 
  5. This was the highest allocation for grid-based solar power at around Rs 3,300 crore.
  6. Solar energy allocation: There has been an additional allocation of Rs 19,500 crore. This was for production-linked incentives (PLI) devoted to high-efficiency solar modules.
  7. This displays the correlation of economic productivity with sustainability. In light of the matter, the Union Budget 2022 - 23 set forth 'Amrit Kaal,' recognizing the power of energy transition in economic growth.

Conclusion

The European Commission's Green Deal Communication highlights that,

"A greater use of green budgeting tools will help to redirect public investment, consumption, and taxation to green priorities and away from harmful subsidies."

Source: European Union

The methodology of budgeting adopts heterogeneity over tools, practices, and measures. Some of them are as follows:

  1. Green Budgeting Surveys
  2. Training support initiatives
  3. Budgetary Items List
  4. Public Revenue generations tools and budgetary practices for greener transition

The various parametric assessments for evaluation of the efficiency of green accounting are as follows:

  1. The intensity of the greening process of the national budgets for the cleaner transition.
  2. The assessment of the entire greenness of the budget with the various objectives.
  3. The method is in alignment with budgeting as priority budgeting. Also, it is in understanding that the real parametric assessment lies in accepting the reality of it being performance-based budgeting.

The concepts, experiences, and revenue generation hold and require transparency and accountability in green budgeting.

The green-sensitive budgeting revolves around the identification of the gaps around climate change. It eventually rests on its incorporation with budgetary alignment and policy-making tools. Climate change and environmental degradation's alignment with economic development remains the challenge in green budgeting. 

Green Budgeting FAQs

Researched and Authored by Anannya Sahani 

Free Resources

To continue learning and advancing your career, check out these additional helpful WSO resources: