CB in NY vs IB in Texas?
Title... have offers for both and was wondering how I should be thinking about the two? CB is under CIB umbrella for a BB while offer in Texas is for a MM but in IB. Should I do a couple of years of CB in NY and then try to switch to IB? Or is it easier to just do IB as an SA and then convert / possibly recruit for FT? Personally prefer NY location-wise, but want to hear perspectives on maybe what the pros and cons of each location and role are.
What's your end goal? 2 years and out to PE, or flexible on timing and ultimate exits? CB can exit to credit-related opportunities if of interest, but if you want vanilla PE the IB role would probably be better (although exits in Houston will mostly be to TX or energy/infra).
You can do a search on here, but Houston can generally be tougher to get out of - whether for lateral, An -> PE in NY, and even SA -> FT. Don't think there is a clear cut answer here, depends on what you are prioritizing.
Voluptatibus dolore perferendis blanditiis mollitia sit odio deserunt. Eaque omnis voluptatibus explicabo asperiores minima voluptatem natus. Dicta quia corrupti vel itaque impedit officia illum. Voluptate quia eum nam a. Sit velit aut sit nulla velit veritatis.
Omnis ut non maxime aliquam. Voluptatum quis et voluptatem dolorum odit reiciendis. Consequuntur nam et aliquid aut voluptate eveniet.
Dolorem quia dignissimos ipsa pariatur reprehenderit aspernatur ut minus. Eveniet reprehenderit incidunt impedit voluptas omnis cumque vero. Distinctio minima sequi facilis voluptas cumque totam doloribus quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...