Most Helpful

Old comment I made. Good luck.

First off, we are going to assume we are talking about a sell-side M&A transaction. There are other functions a bank fills, but most of the time when people imagine investment banking they picture sell-side M&A. At the highest level, a bank in a sell-side process acts as a representative to help sell a business. In theory if you were a CEO or more broadly an owner of a business, you could sell the business yourself, but most the time owners are in the business of owning and running things and don’t have the time or the experience to know the right price to set for their business or the buyers who would be interested in buying their business, or even what makes their business unique and special compared to others in the market. So, they hire an investment bank to help shop their company around and answer questions for buyers so they don’t have to stop doing their actual job which is running and owning a business. 
 

Step 1) Pitching: A investment bank must win the mandate by “pitching” to a company. Sometimes called a “bake-off” where multiple banks will put together a slide show for the owners of a business and say,“hey, we are the best bank to sell this business on behalf of you here’s why”

This part of the process is weird because the job of senior investment bankers is usually to win business and get these mandates by building relationships with owners long before they are selling. As a result, it’s not uncommon for senior bankers to know the company they are pitching to for even decades prior to the pitch. As a result, who will sell the business can many times be decided long before the pitch actually occurs. However, at the end of the day, this “bake-off” will have MD’s very nervous because it determines whether the MD’s and the investment bank will receive millions of dollars of fees and an MD’s salary is often calculated based on the size and number of deals they bring in.
 

This is a long way of saying, analysts and associates during this process will put together a PowerPoint presentation in about a week or two that will be super high stakes with MD’s on edge. MD’s will be demand last minute and late-night changes, while treating things like misaligned logos as an attack on their livelihood because they are worried the owners of a business will see the presentation and think, “this presentation shows a lack of effort—they will probably put little effort into selling my business” This part kinda blows. It’s also why getting into a bank that just “pitches” is considered particularly shitty.

Step 2) Pre-prep work/ drafting: We are assuming you win the pitch, but note this doesn’t happen all the time. Often you have a ton of theatre and a circus and stay up till 3am for 2 weeks creating a PowerPoint about how your bank is the best bank to sell a business and ultimately it was for nothing because they select someone else.

If you win, there is a few month stretch where materials are prepared. Most notably, often a business gets audited by an independent third party (not the bank or the client) to verify there isn’t fraud going on—this is called a QoE or Q of E (quality of earnings). This takes awhile, so while the third party is doing this, the bank begins getting the company ready for questions buyers will ask as well as drafting presentations to market the company. No matter the company, there are some standard questions that usually are asked and an investment bank will help a company prepare the answers to these questions.
 

Examples:

  • Financial projections (the model) and financial statements
  • Legal documents (contracts with customers, support that the company is legally a business, ongoing litigation etc.)
  • customer analyses

There are so many more topics that I’m not going to list them all, but for reference there often are hundreds of questions that a bank helps a company prepare in anticipation of buyers requesting that information. In fact, some questions are so common that buyers will just assume they will have access to it otherwise they will assume something is wrong with the process and company. Something to note in terms of workload: during this part, analysts and associates track which questions are answered, organize the files that answer those questions, and talk to management to get them to provide outstanding requests. While it might sound simple answering questions, each one can often take a lot of work for a single answer due to the company not tracking the data properly. As an example, for something like a customer analysis, buyers commonly want to know things like customer concentration, repeat customers, the geographical distribution etc. and a company might not track that information or they track it, but the last time they did that analysis was a year ago. So, to fix this, they will provide the analysts and associates at an investment bank a list of every customer and transaction they have done and the bankers job will be to analyze the data in excel and maybe make a graph in PowerPoint to show buyers the answers to their questions relating to customers.

On the highest level: imagine anything someone might ask if they were to buy a business or spend hundreds of millions or billions of dollars on a purchase, banks prepare that from the initial question list, to analyzing the data, to making presentations surrounding it.

One thing to note that undergrads often don’t get—modeling is actually a very small part of this process. It’s a large deliverable, but in reality, its only a focus for a very small portion of the time when selling a business from a broader perspective (Probably <1/6 the time of a sell-side M&A process does an analyst sit in a model).

As mentioned, during this process, marketing materials will also be created. So utilizing the raw data a company provides, banks will create fancy materials that say, “here’s what this company does and why you should buy it” Usually there are 3 major presentations:

  • A Teaser—this is usually a very high level view of the business and can be only one page to let buyers know whether they want to learn more about the opportunity.
  • A CIP or CIM (confidential information presentation, confidential information memorandum) this is a more detailed sometimes even 50+ page deck that gives a pretty detailed view of the strengths of a business
  • A management presentation—this is a deck that management will use to help guide a conversation with buyers

Creating all these takes a ton of time manipulating data in excel, creating graphs from that data, and making slides that look pretty in ppt. There also is a ton of strategy in these presentations where banks need to understand what a company does and what buyers want to hear to properly show off the company in a way that gets people interested. 

Step 3) Marketing: You market a company. Some processes are marketed to a small group, some are a large group. Smaller deals in the middle market more people will be able to pay for the business so you can have even 200+ parties that are contacted. For bigger deals or assets that owners want to be more selective they might pick just a handful, it just depends.

Usually senior bankers will send the teaser in an email and say, “hey, let us know if you want to learn more” If they do, junior bankers will work with buyers legal counsel and a clients counsel to negotiate an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) so the buyer can receive more confidential information and the company won’t be afraid the buyer will use it maliciously.
 

Once this is complete, the junior bankers will send the CIP they created and say, “let us know if you want to setup a call with management of the company to explore the opportunity further”

Some buyers will get more under the covers with the CIP and say, “actually we aren’t interested. Others will say, yup, we would love to meet the management team and see what they think about their business”

Also during this process, junior bankers will create a VDR (virtual dataroom) which is basically a high security Dropbox or google drive for files. In this VDR, junior bakers will upload the answers to the hundreds of questions that were prepared in the previous step in an organized fashion. Often they will hide access and potentially only reveal some parts of information if buyers request it or they will upload things to make it look like people are asking questions so other buyers think, “wow, people must really want this company, we should bid high to win!”

Step 4) MP’s: There will be some chats with key buyers and management. Investment banks help ceos practice speaking about their companies strengths and junior bankers prepare that management presentation with a ton of feedback from management. Junior bankers will coordinate with secretaries of buyers to get a call scheduled between busy buyers and the busy management team they are representing.
 

Honestly, as an aside, scheduling is a huge part of the job. Throughout this entire sell-side process analysts and associates will be scheduling calls and putting together little mini presentations from the bank to the client to help guide regular check-in meetings to discuss updates in the process or questions either side might have. 
 

Step 5) Bids: Depending on the process, you could have one round of bids or several. We will assume it’s a two-step process in which case buyers will submit an IOI (indication of interest) that states roughly what they think they would pay for the business, although this isn’t binding and likely could move. This is done usually to narrow the field of buyers and determine which buyers really want the business as well as get a first look at what buyers think the business is worth. That said, since the price isn’t binding it’s mainly utilized to eliminate buyers who are less enthusiastic about the business. Junior bankers will create a presentation to show the company they are representing what bids came in and what it looks like the company is worth—this discussion will then have senior bankers talking to the company about their view on the process and what they think the next steps should be.
 

For the two step process, once the lower bidding buyers are eliminated then the remaining buyers are given more access to information and potentially additional calls are scheduled with management for the remaining parties. Also, senior investment bankers could call buyers privately without the company and let them know things like, “if you pay north of $3B, the owners said they would accept it on the spot and stop talking to all other buyers (exclusivity)” The job of a senior banker here is to guide buyers to pay a high price for the business while also making sure the business gets sold. It’s really quite difficult in practice and this is a huge part of why they get paid the big bucks. They need to convincingly communicate to buyers that they can win the competitive process for a price that is in their best interest while also getting them to pay as much as possible. 

Step 6) pre-final bid and final bids—

With the more narrow buyer field, buyers will have specific questions they want to ask before giving a more binding price. Rather than ask a company directly, an investment bank will serve as the middle-man and will answer buyer questions with files prepared earlier in the process in a timely manner often selectively revealing stuff in the VDR. During this stage, junior bankers will respond to emails from buyers and run adhoc analyses as well. It sounds simple, but you could get close to a 1000 emails a day and tracking to respond to all them and answer each request takes a lot of people being organized and working as a team.  

Eventually, banks submit LOIs (Letter of Intent/ final bids) where there is some negotiation before eventually deciding the buyer that is able to buy the business/ is the winner.

Step 7) diligence—the buyer having won, then will have a huge list of questions they ask a bank to really determine if there is anything material that should shift their binding price down. Additionally, there usually is some negotiation that occurs between the LOI and the purchase agreement that is a more lengthly agreement stating detailed things about what will bring down the price of the deal and whether some cash should be left on the companies balance sheet, what will happen to management etc.

Step 8) signing/ closing: The deal signs and everyone hi-fives because it 95% of the time means the deal will go through. Lawyers need to do diligence and junior bankers help them find files that allow them to do legal/ closing diligence. Also, there usually is filing required for Antitrust regulatory matters.

Step 10) Post closing: the junior team documents the transaction internally which can actually be more involved than you would think. junior bankers create materials to show future clients what happened in that transaction and create closing documentation. Also, usually deals have “closing dinners” and “deal toys” in which the junior team will plan an event with management to celebrate the closing of the transaction. Also, they will have little participation trophies created for everyone involved in the transaction so VP’s can collect them like Pokémon cards and brag to their friends that the number of deals they closed is totally worth them being a 32 year old virgin.

In terms of timing, this process can be done anywhere from 3 months—years. The weird thing about these deals is that everything from what deals are in the market, to the price ownership is expecting to get, to whether buyers are familiar with the story, to the number of buyers, are all going to play into the price and whether a transaction actually get closed. Some deals get to the marketing phase and everyone says, “nope, not interested” Others, you might have ownership who say, “we will only sell for $X and that number doesn’t get met, so they pause the process and resume it a year or two later. 
 

An additional point, as mentioned, a full process can take at the fastest about 3 months because that’s how long regulatory approval and QofE’s can take. A common question new interns or analysts ask or worry about is “how many deals are you on or have you done?” In truth, this is a pretty dumb question. Analysts can join transactions for the last week and “complete” a deal, but the reality is, full reps where you see everything and have responsibility for major deliverables is the most important experience. An analyst who has done 2 full transactions is way more experienced than someone who has experienced just the diligence and marketing steps again and again. Along with this, banks usually don’t staff based on size of deal. So just because you are on a small deal doesn’t mean you are a bad analyst and bigger deals aren’t necessarily better. That said, as you progress, more senior people might request you for projects, so there’s an element of networking, past experience, and luck that impacts the transactions you get to work on. 

 

The other comment I make all the time:

The people that describe sell-side M&A processes as “vanilla” or “not-complex” have their head so far up their ass it’s not even funny. Just based on the timeline I gave above, if you do an entire M&A process start to finish, it takes like 3+ months and likely longer. In a year, you aren’t going to get more than 3 full processes done and even that is unlikely especially in non-boom environments.

More likely is it takes like 1.5 years to get 3 full deals done (note, joining a deal for diligence doesn’t make you an M&A expert or even count as a rep, it’s like .2 a rep). The last 6 months of a stint, I can get being bored of a sell-side role and wanting a change, but to question the complexity of sell-side transactions is just so unbelievably ignorant and arrogant. If it’s a bank on this forum, you are probably working on a top 1000 biggest transaction that year in the world.

There’s levels of complexity. The first go around, you are just understanding how to send an email properly or what the hell is going on and how to complete things without getting yelled at. Most new analysts are trying to learn ppt shortcuts and the location of files in a drive. This doesn’t make you experienced, it’s making you have a bare minimum level of competence.

The second deal, you might be able to actually explain the M&A process and have an understanding of what is going on and how things are going. Heck, you might even be able to predict deliverables and know where things are and how to do them without being told. This also does not make you experienced or the transaction boring, it means you finally can do your job.
 

By the 3rd full transaction, you might finally be able to observe differences between that transaction and others you have done in the past and provide insight. You might actually be a trustworthy source for completing a deliverable and advising someone on running a process in a very general sense.

By the 4th, you might finally be able to improve things and make your organization better. Maybe you design a new faster way of doing things or create templates that everyone else can use because you are now considered an expert in your bank. It’s at this point that you either leave or become an associate that rocks to work with because you have seen stuff. However, even then, you might find there are weird twists and turns in a process you have never seen before. Maybe a buyer walks at the 11th hour, maybe you run a process and your md is able to convince a client to bid a ton when there is no one else bidding.

I left after 2 years because I felt my learning was slowing down relative to what I learned at the beginning of my stint and I disliked the industry because I thought I could learn more, get paid more, and be treated better somewhere else. But, I still didn’t understand the complexity of sell side m&a by the time I left. Could I superficially lead a process and give really good advice for a company selling or raising capital? For sure. Could I provide industry insight, buyer intelligence, or actually know where to put a bid to put a bid to win a process or how best to sell and position a company? Absolutely not. Also, fwiw, most the analysts in my class I think couldn’t even give an accurate timeline of a transaction by the end of their stint. The arrogance of IB analysts to somehow complete an entire model and not know the ebitda and revenue and growth rates of a company was always stunning to me.

In summary, it’s complex and there are levels past moving logos, get a few transactions under your belt then jump ship.
 

 

You spend 3 months in analysis paralysis iterating menial changes to long-winded financial models and CIMs debating what shade of blue should be used to attract maximum buyer interest then you go to market and get your asshole ripped apart by cautious investors who bid 25% below the valuation guidance you gave your client and beat your fee down in the process. The client goes through an identity crisis and threatens to kill you and sue you and then disgrace your family and you helplessly take the abuse, lowering your dignity along with your fee. Ultimately the client says yeah sure fuck it whatever we have to sell and they accept shit terms and you accept your shit fee, telling yourself you'll exit to corporate after one more bonus cycle but you never do.

 

Est est at quia totam provident recusandae. Dolor repellendus reprehenderit omnis dolorem aliquid.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”