Anybody have a minority growth equity model example / test? Interviewing soon

Have an upcoming interview at a large growth firm. It's a 90 minute test, from scratch. Anybody have resources to prep? Thank you!

For an associate role

Mod alert: We have announced a PE Interview boot camp for July 21, 2023. Check it out here: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/courses/live-training/private-equity-interview-bootcamp. Happy recruiting!

Mod alert 2: The Bootcamp is sold out. If you couldn't get a seat, please check out our PE interview Course. Good luck with the interviews!

 

If you are interviewing at a large firm, I would start with understanding the types of the deals that they do. Many of the larger firms will use some debt for “growth buyout” deals and the modeling is essentially the same as an LBO. GE may have some structure to their equity investments (particularly in minority deals), so know how to model common features like liquidation preference in your return analysis.

 

For "classic" growth equity (Series C-F), essence of the modeling is low-gearing PE. Should have triggers for rev or ebitda defined equity ratchet but otherwise same model you'd use to prep for a buyout shop. Good luck brother.

 
Most Helpful

Given the test is only 90 minutes, it will likely be a pretty straightforward linking of the statements and calculating a MOIC and IRR. However, there are a few things that growth equity firms put into their modeling test that deviate from standard LBO models: (1) Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases and (2) Liquidation Preferences.

I've provided example questions and solutions below for both of these features. Also, I'm always happy to help, so let me know if you have any questions. If you want the Excel and case study that I used for the below exhibits, just PM me (open to anyone).

Special Feature 1: Primary vs. Secondary Equity Purchases  

Description

Primary equity involves the issuance of new equity by the company, thereby increasing the company’s equity value. A secondary equity transaction consists of the purchase of existing shares from current investors (usually at a discount to pre-money equity value) in the business and therefore does not increase the equity value of the company

Secondary share purchases from employees/founders do not come with liquidation preferences or any other special terms since they are just common shares. Accordingly, firms that have conviction on the upside potential of the investment might want to purchase more secondary shares (as they capture upside through the discounted price of the shares)

Modeling Prompt Question 

It has been indicated that our firm could participate in a Series D round that is expected to be comprised of $50 million of primary equity issued at a $500 million pre-money valuation. Additionally, one of the founders has indicated he is willing to sell $30 million of secondary equity to our firm at a $350 million equity value.

After participating in both the primary equity issuance and secondary sale, how much of the company would our firm own on a post-money basis?

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044359-2

Special Feature 2: Liquidation Preference

Description

A liquidation preference is an instrument typical in early-stage growth investments, whereby a new investor is guaranteed a minimum return on their investment at the exit. The liquidation preference is junior to all debt-like instruments in the capital structure but effectively ranks senior to ordinary equity.

Modeling Prompt Question 

Building off the example above, your firm is considering asking the company to add a 2.0x liquidation preference to the primary equity portion of the investment (i.e., the $50 million). 

To assess the value of a 2.0x liquidation on the primary equity component, please contemplate a downside scenario where the business is sold for $600 million. Calculate our firm's return on investment (MOM and IRR) both with and without the 2.0x liquidation preference on the primary equity component.

Modeling Prompt Solution

image-20230527044523-4

image-20230527044548-5

image-20230527045010-8

Array
 

Genuinely shocked at how much you went out of your way to share such insights, please could you send across the materials via PM? I'm currently interviewing for a few top GE funds atm, and getting close to the Case Study stage, so would be a massive help. Thanks in advance!

 

Why isn't the secondary being diluted by the Liq Pref? That true-up should dilute all others holder? Case is silent on where secondary ranks.

Distributable Equity value = $544.1

Proceeds to Series D with Liq Pred = $100 (49.5+100)

Remain Pot =  $444.1

Secondary Stake of Remaining Pot = 8.6% / (1-9.1%)= 9.46%. That is once D is paid, we have claim to 9.46% of the remaining pot

9.46% *($544.1 - 100) = $41.9 or 1.4x MOIC on secondary.

My issue with above table in your post is that you can't true-up without taking it away from others...

 

Thank you for pointing this out and providing a rationale, I appreciate it. I've updated my comment above to reflect the dilution from the true-up issuance that results from the liquidation preference.

Array
 

Good point on the liquidation preference needing to dilute other holders. 

Question though - if you're reducing Distributable Equity Value by the liquidation preference (Primary), why also adjust the Secondary % Equity Ownership?  Wouldn't it just be the Secondary's equity ownership applied to a now-smaller Distributable Equity Value (e.g. $444.1)?  Doing both feels like double-counting; please help if I'm missing something.

 

your name makes me think you work at FT partners ($140k base btw), so I was hesitant to send over. that being said, i have sent against my better judgement. tell steve McLaughlin i say hi

Array
 

Hello there, this is really helpful to see. Would you please share the materials with me as well? Many thanks in advance.

 

Hi,

I know I am a bit late, but would you mind sharing this with me? Would really appreciate it. God bless!

 

I hope everyone asking for the model has at least tried to recreate the exercise themselves first…

 

Temporibus eum ut quos distinctio temporibus laboriosam beatae. Expedita eligendi iste eveniet ipsam aut suscipit. Laudantium libero nulla tempore eaque quo. Sed tempore reiciendis expedita ut alias atque autem. Ex architecto delectus explicabo molestiae qui.

Error libero recusandae enim voluptas veniam. Odio ut dolor corrupti aut qui aperiam tempora. Assumenda ad voluptate totam.

 

Quia quis suscipit consequatur quam quis facere. Nisi non ipsa est ut tempore culpa voluptatem. Sit ea laboriosam suscipit in. Sit animi quo distinctio suscipit odit rem aliquid.

Tenetur ab voluptatum recusandae aut. Corrupti laudantium quae quia id. Dolorem earum necessitatibus dolorem veritatis dolorem animi voluptas tempora. Quibusdam facilis dolorem inventore est officiis velit. Consequuntur harum aut architecto accusamus ut hic officia. Ex possimus tempora et.

Error omnis aut ut delectus voluptatem. Eum mollitia aut adipisci sit. Quo magni dolor est incidunt velit atque. Qui eveniet quia sit sit. Blanditiis officia qui recusandae voluptate.

 

Nisi asperiores velit quia facilis beatae ut quaerat. Corporis labore id nisi assumenda pariatur ullam. Sint quia repellat voluptates at sed voluptas. Recusandae cupiditate repudiandae quis. Doloribus dolorum eum unde atque aliquam.

Quaerat dolores pariatur illo officia aut. Pariatur autem et ipsum ut perspiciatis assumenda eius. Vel eum eveniet eos occaecati sit. Iure vel aut perspiciatis sed quia ab assumenda. Pariatur sed repellendus labore totam non dolorum ea repellendus.

Optio eveniet accusamus est maiores eveniet et dolor. Quis cupiditate provident quasi qui placeat.

 

Enim tempore quia ipsam ducimus explicabo. Aspernatur ullam sint voluptas non voluptates. Praesentium atque ut hic dolorem amet laudantium voluptas.

Sit delectus iste non optio fugiat. Ea laboriosam et esse tempora est eum sed. Voluptates est temporibus et cupiditate quo id id. Esse et qui at soluta quas molestiae. Voluptas voluptatem minus nihil aperiam corporis eum ut. Consequatur nobis id impedit provident rerum repudiandae.

Array
 

Sunt totam dolorem aut enim similique omnis. Ab sed molestias fugit rem. Et aut possimus adipisci tempora quidem dolores. Ratione ipsam sequi et necessitatibus quo est aliquid. Repellendus cum asperiores nobis quasi. Illum sed qui dicta et ut maiores.

Hic corrupti et debitis odio et repudiandae perspiciatis. Nemo praesentium voluptas error aut eveniet sint quisquam. Nam et blanditiis facilis sunt. Asperiores cupiditate nemo rerum nostrum cupiditate explicabo blanditiis. Aut accusantium exercitationem pariatur. Quis aliquam dolorem officiis dolores.

Commodi itaque rem assumenda quas assumenda assumenda. Quia laborum praesentium corrupti ex corrupti. Est tempora delectus dolor incidunt voluptatum nemo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”