I’ve heard it’s a great culture. 9-9 or so, good parties at seniors’ mansions, get to live in LA.

Also their approach is to pay a premium for quality assets. I assume this translates to fewer, but much more in-depth proposals that actually lead to an acquisition (as they aren’t always trying to pay bottom dollar and then inevitably get outbid).

Definitely a target firm for me for that alone. That’s how I want to learn how to invest.

 
Most Helpful

All I can say is that it's not the firms that harp about how great their culture is. If all they do is claim they have amazing culture, it either means 1) they have shit culture or 2) culture is great only if you fit into their mold of what an acceptable cultural addition is. Steer clear. 

Firms that actually have good culture don't feel the need to flaunt it. 

 

Agree with this. Berkshire and Bain were known for having generally better culture than the other funds in Boston (and are generally known for above-average / strong culture relative to broader PE - that's not a stale POV). Yes there's always some variance depending on who exactly you're working with, and as firms get bigger it gets hard to maintain that / keep narrow variance, but both consistently known for investing in culture and junior development pretty meaningfully, and in having more consistency at the mid / senior ranks over time. 

 

If by great culture you mean they’re generally nice and friendly, yeah it exists in some places. If you mean that you can set and enforce reasonable boundaries around weekends and PTO and personal life, you won’t find that anywhere. 
 

Basically at best you’ll be able to find a culture where people are nice to you to your face but will continue to ignore any and all of your personal boundaries and commitments outside of work. For some people, that will be enough and will make them happy but for others they’ll continue to feel burned out, resentful, and angry even in that environment. It’s the nature of the industry, you sign up for indentured servitude in exchange for very large economic rewards and a differentiated skillset. That fundamental trade off will exist everywhere in the industry. 

 

Ok but as someone who works at a firm that has all that negative stuff + major assholes, don't discount the benefit of having nice people to your face. Getting texts on vacation is much better when its "So sorry to drop this on you" instead of "did you even look at this..."

 

Because Bain is a consulting company and the question was specifically about private equity firms…

 

From all the firms I’ve spoken with, Warburg and TA have had the kindest, most helpful and down to earth people without a doubt

 

Warburg is a where souls go to die (except for the hc group). Ppl work insane hours and culture is THE WORST. Everyone thinks they’re the shit and are extremely condescending. Some groups haven’t closed deals in 3-4yrs, what a joke.

 

And they don't want you either lol. You probably weren't even President of the LSE Alternative Investment Conference. 

 

Nope, although it certainly helps with their benchmark looksmaxxing standards. Anyone below 8.5/10 SMV (think non-mewing, non-mouth-taping, non-jelqing) gets insta-dinged.

 

Agree with above poster that their culture reputationally is more uptight. They've also had a really high rate of senior turnover over the years and reportedly have had some political infighting the last few years, so culture is pretty inconsistent and heavily dependent on who you work directly with - that's somewhat true to an extent everywhere, but seems there's meaningfully more variance at THL. 

 

Culture is not particularly great. Considerable turnover at the midlevel (personally know two who quit within 1.5 years or so post MBA) and a lot of frustration / long hours stemming from hanging around processes they have no shot at winning. Sounds like they’re pretty hands on with a lot of their portcos and it’s often tricky navigating relationship between investment and operating teams. 

 

"Hanging around processes" point is too real. Seems to be happening at a lot of undifferentiated MM firms who can't underwrite anything different in their model and win on price.  

 

Just went through Boston recruiting. Took notes on all of the funds I engaged with / was interested in:

Battery Ventures (buyout team vibes personality wise in line with their VCteam, biggest downside at junior level is sourcing is entire job)

Bain Cap / Berkshire (plenty already out there on these two, but increasingly being more team dependent and thus more variable) - could add Charlesbank / Advent into this bucket, but 10-15% weaker culture / wlb

TA Associates (associates all sound like best friends…grain of salt ofc, but only get strong impression of junior-level culture, biggest knock is upward mobility is challenging, if possible, and sourcing makes it a “always on” type job)

BV Investment Partners (sleeper in tech given they sit closer to the IT services + software hybrid space, best culture impression out of all the firms I talked to, great wlb as well, and some 40% IRRfunds recently)

Great Hill (current bank works with them alot, incredibly impressive investors, and have only heard fantastic things about their culture) - Silversmith = a smaller version of this

THL (stuffier, but highly coaching / mentorship oriented and supportive, hired a head of talent dev recently who really impressed me, hours are banking 2.0)

 

Do you know if any boston firms still recruiting for Summer 2024 as of today?

 

Anyone know any of the cultures at the software focused funds on the west coast in MM? Specifically STG, Marlin, Vector, AKKR, etc.

 

Choosing a fund with a good company culture can have a significant impact on your career and job satisfaction. There are several good options.
Bain Capital: Known for its collegial atmosphere, employee support, and professional development opportunities.
The Carlyle Group: Provides many career opportunities and innovative training programs.

 

Speaking anecdotally from places where my banking class ended up (so these are what my friends tell me):

- Carlyle: absolute dog shit, incredibly toxic culture, long hours (like 9am-10pm every day in office) and you get kicked out after 2 years, mid-low tier comp
- Bain: decent (?) culture but long hours and you have to move to Boston
- TPG: good culture (due to the SF vibe), hours depend on what fund you’re on (also if you’re in New York you work west coast hours so later start to the morning), comp is good and all cash
- KKR: decent culture depending on what team you’re on, hours are good when not super busy, decent comp but part of it is stock
- TH Lee: have heard the most horrendous stories about this place, terrible hours and culture and multiple friends who went here have dipped/are looking to dip, also you have to move to Boston which is ass

 

Bain culture not great due to bad returns resulting in high turnover from what I understand. And micromanage-y consulting internal style. Plus don’t trust advisors to do anything right / think they’re smarter than anyone else so you’ll do your own CDD alongside the consultants

 

I have friends at the following firms: Spectrum, JMI, TA Associates, Banneker, Summit, and Mainsail. All of these are software buyout firms focused on proprietary deals -- common thread here is sourcing, which typically attracts more outgoing personalities. I wouldn't say these are lifestyle firms - they work hard, but friends are “happy” with who they work with.

 

Ipsam aliquam ut nostrum blanditiis mollitia odio. Tempora sint voluptas illo repellat quas ut molestias. Voluptatem repellendus et numquam corrupti ipsa. Qui amet veniam aut voluptas qui.

Quos nobis sit adipisci dolor eos ut exercitationem doloribus. Tempore repudiandae non adipisci distinctio velit quae. Officiis quia suscipit velit incidunt. Eum nulla optio saepe commodi cupiditate deleniti tempora. Sunt a dolorem excepturi consectetur.

Voluptas a porro et officiis totam ipsum quia. Impedit veritatis itaque tempore ipsam eveniet harum. Omnis animi est vero blanditiis nobis dicta. Commodi ullam autem expedita et est quam. Cum corrupti est omnis quam quod mollitia at quia.

Quod impedit aperiam quia harum voluptates accusamus ad. Animi recusandae autem eveniet quidem ut est vel. Sequi soluta dignissimos repudiandae non. Cupiditate aliquam molestiae vel.

 

Blanditiis porro est eum dolor. Laboriosam ex consequuntur voluptas. Adipisci officiis amet provident vero omnis aut. Error ut vel debitis vero possimus. Quidem qui earum ullam.

Et sit iusto similique ut et numquam. Consequuntur est voluptas occaecati maxime esse voluptatem a quasi. Cupiditate laborum voluptatem non fugiat quia. Ut distinctio quis nesciunt maiores rerum ipsam.

Debitis quidem iusto dolore asperiores eum voluptas ut. Neque odio consequatur culpa illo et.

Provident qui unde sed voluptas omnis quia. Eveniet est reprehenderit excepturi et dolor omnis.

 

Dolorum a et sed omnis excepturi. Optio aliquid eum corporis omnis. Sed accusantium aut dolorem corporis soluta est. Quis dolores sit qui quae. Est rerum repudiandae non dolorem doloremque maxime sit.

Voluptatem qui explicabo debitis hic quo adipisci nisi. Quas expedita aut dolorem veniam eligendi.

Totam nostrum nihil dolorem voluptatem facere velit illo eum. Perspiciatis libero quia quis beatae omnis fuga quae dolore.

 

Dolor repudiandae deserunt voluptatem ipsa officia. Mollitia neque quam expedita voluptas nemo saepe. Praesentium autem laudantium quae et quam. Qui sed ea rem et dolore est.

Consectetur perspiciatis natus nulla. Doloribus nulla modi iste. Qui nam perferendis assumenda labore optio harum.

Sint blanditiis et nobis et sed corporis deleniti tempora. Non corrupti alias ipsa.

 

Sit aliquid ipsum nihil sed qui. Quia velit repudiandae minima. Neque quis praesentium sequi rerum. Aliquam rem sunt quae qui velit earum autem odio.

Iusto fugit est mollitia alias ipsa. Sit maiores quae in ducimus qui dolor. Dolor sed suscipit itaque perspiciatis sit libero atque sed. Illo voluptate eaque aliquam consectetur non possimus est sequi.

Est quas fuga occaecati maxime corrupti reprehenderit molestias. Enim nulla dignissimos eum est est. Ducimus incidunt quia et velit recusandae. Molestiae saepe itaque nemo velit unde consequuntur a. Quasi enim rerum illum fugit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”