How to Model SaaS Projections for Interviews

Hey WSO - this post is specifically for those of you in IB / Consulting who are interested in breaking into Software Buyout, Growth Buyout, Growth Equity, or Late Stage VC.


Now that I'm in the industry, I want to help you guys understand how to actually model out SaaS LBOs, based on Customer Cube data. There was so little information on this when I was recruiting and I had to piece together bits of wisdom from a wide range of posts to figure this out. It's a lot easier to wrap your head around when you can reference an actual example.


To pay it forward, I've put together a basic model that maps out Beg ARR, New Logo ARR, Upsell ARR, Downsell ARR, Churn ARR, and Ending ARR -- based on raw customer revenue data. You can see how this is all projected based on an assumed S&M spend, which is applied to an assumed CAC to get # of new Logos, which is multiplied against ACV to get your New Logo ARR in order to build out your ARR projection. From there, you can see how beg and ending ARR balances can be averaged out as a % of actual historical Revenue. After that - it's fairly standard % cost margins against revenue (except for S&M spend).


Note that this is just 1 basic way to model this out. However, this should be sufficient to land a software buyout associate role. You can use this as a start and build additional complexity in the model based on what you want to solve for (headcount planning, S&M driven by # Reps, New logos driven by Rep Attainment, etc). 


Comment below and I'll send you a link to the model in Google Sheets.


UPDATE: Due to high demand, I've removed the raw data and shared a simplified ARR -> Revenue Projection build in the link below. You can use this as the foundation to build your LBO model & add complexity. I should emphasize that you should understand the underlying assumptions for sales efficiency (Product Led Growth vs Enterprise Sales motion) - some thoughtful comments below I’d encourage yall to read through.


Link Here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q2dTXc0u7…

 
Most Helpful

Out of an interest in giving back as well I might add some color since I am a software buyouts guy. When you look at something like S&M you should really think about what the cost is there. And for classic enterprise software (not PLG software) the cost is reps. And so another way to think about this is if you assume a certain path of rep productivity (ramp over 18 months) you can actually start with the number of reps you want to add (so part of S&M is a function of that) and then say OK we have capacity to bring on xyz amount of capital, what kind of return can we make on that given a certain rep productivity path. And then you also want to model out CAC, and say ok is this going to be the same, or is this a consumer internet business and CAC is going to quadruple in four years?

 

Having previously invested in and worked at a SaaS business as well as evaluated candidate case studies, happy to share some thoughts. The model shared is definitely very high level and correctly touches on the components that lead to revenue projections. However in terms of interviewing and possibly doing a case study/model test, there needs to be more concrete thoughts on how you're arriving to your ARR and revenue figures – a few examples would be whether the business is Enterprise or PLG driven (this would impact how you think about S&M in terms of seller productivity vs TOFU marketing spend and CAC), what SKUs/plans are offered and what does retention look like (which implies having a cohort waterfall built). 

 

Yes, for the purposes of this. If you have services revenue, then its just an attach rate on Software revenue to get Services revenue. If you need a more complex model, then you can do bookings revenue (software) that gets recognized over time and have your services/implementation fee alongside new bookings.

 

Illo nemo eaque cupiditate magni corporis debitis. Maxime dolor dolores tempore veniam dignissimos optio. Dolores dolore assumenda eaque aut qui et.

Quis veniam dicta atque cum cupiditate. Sunt fugit quis quaerat rerum accusantium. Id ducimus ipsum et quasi nihil impedit. Est iste repellat amet est ut quod saepe. Laborum et eos at delectus eaque.

 

Odit in occaecati expedita deserunt. Suscipit nihil iure et quos mollitia. Aliquam deleniti et quia mollitia voluptatem veniam voluptate.

Sunt ducimus aperiam doloremque aut. Veniam omnis tempora quia vel voluptatem consequuntur veritatis nihil. Recusandae error consequatur deserunt nisi quam enim adipisci. Autem totam fuga dolore accusantium praesentium alias perspiciatis.

Est et minima consequatur. Non et delectus fugit ad nobis voluptatem. Aut laborum at repudiandae rerum suscipit maxime voluptates. Praesentium nihil dolore corporis quod voluptas. Nostrum in praesentium est.

 

Quae nemo ut quo eaque quod quod sunt. Inventore sint ut voluptas totam. Omnis provident nihil qui accusantium aperiam. Eligendi excepturi deserunt et sint voluptate. Dolor eaque neque sapiente fugiat ut eos.

Sunt nesciunt et sequi molestias omnis sequi. Excepturi illo est rerum molestiae. Et voluptas non animi quia. Repellendus neque ullam aspernatur sunt natus perferendis non. Et corrupti aut necessitatibus laborum sed unde et.

Magni tempora asperiores laborum enim nihil voluptas. Repellendus tenetur officiis nam hic sit. Fuga expedita sit magnam rerum fugit unde ipsam. Doloremque ducimus expedita blanditiis eum maxime. Et ipsam est est eius necessitatibus doloremque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”