PRIVATE EQUITY DIVERSITY STATS - As of April, 2024
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2022, 2023, YTD 2024.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Bain Capital
03
97.9%
Altamont Capital
07
95.8%
HarbourVest
05
93.8%
Carlyle Group
09
91.7%
K1 Investment Management
06
89.6%
Advent International Corporation
13
87.5%
Ardian
08
85.4%
Blackstone Group
06
83.3%
Partners Group
03
81.3%
Insight Venture Partners
07
79.2%
Audax Group
11
77.1%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts)
02
75.0%
Vista Equity Partners
10
72.9%
Hamilton Lane
06
70.8%
Providence Strategic Growth
09
68.8%
Novacap
04
66.7%
Constellation Software Inc
01
64.6%
Graham Partners
07
62.5%
Global Infrastructure Partners
18
60.4%
Silver Lake
02
58.3%
The Riverside Company
05
56.3%
LGT Capital Partners
24
54.2%
Brown Brothers Harriman
06
52.1%
General Atlantic
17
50.0%
H.I.G. Capital
04
47.9%
Arrowroot Capital
21
45.8%
Pathway Capital Management
06
43.8%
JMI Equity
22
41.7%
NextGen Growth Partners
18
39.6%
Eurazeo
22
37.5%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Centerbridge Partners (53.2%)
01
98.1%
Providence Strategic Growth (51.9%)
01
96.3%
Cerberus Capital Management (45.6%)
18
94.4%
Alpine Investors (39.9%)
10
92.6%
NextGen Growth Partners (39.9%)
15
90.7%
Silver Lake (39.9%)
02
88.9%
Novacap (38.1%)
11
87.0%
Equity Group Investments (36.5%)
07
85.2%
Apollo Global Management (36.5%)
07
83.3%
JMI Equity (35.4%)
No
81.5%
Partners Group (35.1%)
No
79.6%
Hamilton Lane (34.6%)
24
77.8%
Blackstone Group (32.9%)
31
75.9%
Starwood Capital Group (31.3%)
02
74.1%
Altamont Capital (31.3%)
07
72.2%
Bain Capital (27.3%)
07
70.4%
LLR Partners (26.6%)
04
68.5%
Accordion Partners (23.8%)
23
66.7%
Accel-KKR (23.8%)
24
64.8%
Koch Equity Development (23.8%)
13
63.0%
Advent International Corporation (22.8%)
27
61.1%
Global Infrastructure Partners (19.8%)
05
59.3%
Insight Venture Partners (17.0%)
29
57.4%
Roark Capital Group (17.0%)
30
55.6%
Audax Group (14.9%)
06
53.7%
Ardian (13.3%)
11
51.9%
Vista Equity Partners (11.9%)
11
50.0%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (11.0%)
23
48.1%
Summit Partners (3.8%)
11
46.3%
CIM Group (3.8%)
36
44.4%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Graham Partners (44.7%)
No
98.1%
CIM Group (42.6%)
01
96.3%
Volition Capital (42.6%)
01
94.4%
Constellation Software Inc (39.2%)
02
92.6%
Cinven (26.7%)
11
90.7%
The Riverside Company (23.7%)
11
88.9%
JMI Equity (23.7%)
02
87.0%
Summit Partners (22.6%)
10
85.2%
Accel-KKR (22.6%)
10
83.3%
Koch Equity Development (22.6%)
05
81.5%
K1 Investment Management (21.3%)
10
79.6%
AEA Investors (18.9%)
13
77.8%
LLR Partners (17.8%)
26
75.9%
Cerberus Capital Management (16.2%)
29
74.1%
L Catterton (16.2%)
15
72.2%
Altamont Capital (16.2%)
13
70.4%
Insight Venture Partners (16.2%)
16
68.5%
Alpine Investors (14.2%)
11
66.7%
Audax Group (14.2%)
14
64.8%
Silver Lake (14.2%)
16
63.0%
Ardian (13.1%)
11
61.1%
Providence Strategic Growth (11.3%)
13
59.3%
Bain Capital (11.2%)
18
57.4%
Novacap (10.3%)
20
55.6%
Blackstone Group (10.1%)
15
53.7%
Advent International Corporation (8.1%)
01
51.9%
Partners Group (7.4%)
01
50.0%
KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) (5.7%)
02
48.1%
Providence Equity (2.6%)
41
46.3%
Accordion Partners (2.6%)
44
44.4%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Silver Lake (25.1%)
No
98.1%
Ardian (12.5%)
No
96.3%
Hamilton Lane (6.7%)
01
94.4%
Summit Partners (0.2%)
36
92.6%
CIM Group (0.2%)
12
90.7%
Providence Equity (0.2%)
32
88.9%
Accordion Partners (0.2%)
36
87.0%
Arrowroot Capital (0.2%)
47
85.2%
Volition Capital (0.2%)
12
83.3%
GCM Grosvenor (0.2%)
43
81.5%
Accel-KKR (0.2%)
35
79.6%
Mvision Private Equity Advisors (0.2%)
17
77.8%
Koch Equity Development (0.2%)
17
75.9%
TPG Global (0.2%)
60
74.1%
Equity Group Investments (0.2%)
36
72.2%
Blackford Capital (0.2%)
45
70.4%
EQT Partners (0.2%)
31
68.5%
Apollo Global Management (0.2%)
38
66.7%
Centerbridge Partners (0.2%)
52
64.8%
LP Analyst (0.2%)
40
63.0%
Pathway Capital Management (0.2%)
33
61.1%
Brown Brothers Harriman (0.2%)
28
59.3%
AEA Investors (0.2%)
34
57.4%
Global Infrastructure Partners (0.2%)
54
55.6%
General Atlantic (0.2%)
52
53.7%
Eurazeo (0.1%)
37
51.9%
Cerberus Capital Management (0.1%)
56
50.0%
L Catterton (0.1%)
37
48.1%
Starwood Capital Group (0.1%)
52
46.3%
Graham Partners (0.1%)
54
44.4%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?