HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2022
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2020, 2021, 2022.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
AQR Capital Management
13
96.6%
Bridgewater Associates
01
93.1%
D.E. Shaw
01
89.7%
Point72
No
86.2%
Two Sigma Investments
04
82.8%
Citadel Investment Group
No
79.3%
Squarepoint Capital
01
75.9%
Bridgewater Associates LP
08
72.4%
Millennium Management
02
69.0%
Arena Investors LP
01
65.5%
Abdiel Capital
02
62.1%
Magnetar Capital
03
58.6%
Man Group
09
55.2%
Blackstone Group
09
51.7%
Balyasny Asset Management
03
48.3%
Millennium Global
01
44.8%
Qube Research and Technologies
New
41.4%
Worldquant
01
37.9%
Millennium Partners
01
34.5%
Exoduspoint
09
31.0%
Oaktree Capital Management
05
27.6%
Graham Capital Management
01
24.1%
Valiant Capital Management
04
20.7%
Ellington Management Group
12
17.2%
Angelo Gordon & Co
No
13.8%
xlp capital
05
10.3%
Bayview Asset Management LLC
New
6.9%
Oak Hill Advisors
05
3.4%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management
New
0.0%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Baupost Group (69.7%)
No
97.1%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (69.7%)
New
94.1%
Oak Hill Advisors (53.1%)
No
91.2%
Blackstone Group (35.4%)
04
88.2%
Abdiel Capital (31.8%)
01
85.3%
Bridgewater Associates (31.2%)
01
82.4%
D.E. Shaw (30.2%)
02
79.4%
AQR Capital Management (29.9%)
06
76.5%
Ellington Management Group (23.7%)
05
73.5%
Valiant Capital Management (19.7%)
01
70.6%
Point72 (17.2%)
02
67.6%
Balyasny Asset Management (15.6%)
03
64.7%
Two Sigma Investments (14.8%)
05
61.8%
Bridgewater Associates LP (14.8%)
08
58.8%
Citadel Investment Group (13.6%)
02
55.9%
Millennium Management (13.3%)
04
52.9%
Man Group (10.8%)
01
50.0%
Magnetar Capital (9.1%)
22
47.1%
Squarepoint Capital (4.2%)
23
44.1%
Fiera Capital (3.7%)
01
41.2%
xlp capital (3.7%)
01
38.2%
Highland Capital Management (3.7%)
08
35.3%
G Research (3.7%)
New
32.4%
Millennium Global (3.7%)
03
29.4%
GoldenTree Asset Management (3.1%)
07
26.5%
Arena Investors LP (3.1%)
09
23.5%
Graham Capital Management (2.6%)
11
20.6%
Qube Research and Technologies (2.6%)
03
17.6%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (2.6%)
New
14.7%
Angelo Gordon & Co (2.3%)
06
11.8%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (72.5%)
New
97.1%
Magnetar Capital (23.7%)
01
94.1%
Bridgewater Associates (23.3%)
06
91.2%
Millennium Global (21.5%)
03
88.2%
Blackstone Group (12.0%)
09
85.3%
Man Group (9.8%)
34
82.4%
Point72 (9.7%)
05
79.4%
Millennium Management (7.9%)
11
76.5%
Balyasny Asset Management (7.7%)
02
73.5%
Worldquant (6.3%)
07
70.6%
Citadel Investment Group (5.5%)
05
67.6%
AQR Capital Management (4.5%)
04
64.7%
D.E. Shaw (4.4%)
02
61.8%
Two Sigma Investments (3.1%)
04
58.8%
Fiera Capital (1.5%)
10
55.9%
xlp capital (1.5%)
04
52.9%
Ellington Management Group (1.5%)
18
50.0%
Highland Capital Management (1.5%)
07
47.1%
G Research (1.5%)
New
44.1%
Baupost Group (1.3%)
08
41.2%
GoldenTree Asset Management (1.3%)
08
38.2%
Oak Hill Advisors (1.3%)
15
35.3%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (1.3%)
New
32.4%
Arena Investors LP (1.3%)
12
29.4%
Valiant Capital Management (1.3%)
05
26.5%
Graham Capital Management (1.1%)
15
23.5%
Qube Research and Technologies (1.1%)
04
20.6%
Bridgewater Associates LP (1.0%)
15
17.6%
Angelo Gordon & Co (1.0%)
09
14.7%
Oaktree Capital Management (0.8%)
09
11.8%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
G Research (40.6%)
New
97.1%
Millennium Global (20.6%)
No
94.1%
AQR Capital Management (4.3%)
02
91.2%
Point72 (2.2%)
02
88.2%
Fiera Capital (0.6%)
05
85.3%
xlp capital (0.6%)
05
82.4%
Ellington Management Group (0.6%)
20
79.4%
Highland Capital Management (0.6%)
09
76.5%
Baupost Group (0.5%)
11
73.5%
GoldenTree Asset Management (0.5%)
11
70.6%
Oak Hill Advisors (0.5%)
18
67.6%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (0.5%)
New
64.7%
Arena Investors LP (0.5%)
15
61.8%
Valiant Capital Management (0.5%)
08
58.8%
Graham Capital Management (0.4%)
20
55.9%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.4%)
02
52.9%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.4%)
New
50.0%
Bridgewater Associates LP (0.4%)
14
47.1%
Angelo Gordon & Co (0.4%)
11
44.1%
Blackstone Group (0.3%)
13
41.2%
Oaktree Capital Management (0.3%)
10
38.2%
Abdiel Capital (0.3%)
03
35.3%
Man Group (0.3%)
11
32.4%
Exoduspoint (0.3%)
No
29.4%
Magnetar Capital (0.2%)
12
26.5%
Balyasny Asset Management (0.2%)
13
23.5%
Millennium Partners (0.2%)
09
20.6%
Worldquant (0.2%)
10
17.6%
Squarepoint Capital (0.1%)
11
14.7%
Two Sigma Investments (0.1%)
27
11.8%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?