HEDGE FUNDS DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2023

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2021, 2022, 2023.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
AQR Capital Management
No
96.0%
D.E. Shaw
01
92.0%
Bridgewater Associates
01
88.0%
Point72
No
84.0%
Qube Research and Technologies
12
80.0%
Citadel Investment Group
No
76.0%
Abdiel Capital
04
72.0%
Oak Hill Advisors
20
68.0%
Man Group
04
64.0%
Blackstone Group
04
60.0%
Millennium Management
02
56.0%
Balyasny Asset Management
03
52.0%
Squarepoint Capital
06
48.0%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb
New
44.0%
Two Sigma Investments
10
40.0%
Millennium Partners
03
36.0%
Worldquant
01
32.0%
Exoduspoint
02
28.0%
Magnetar Capital
07
24.0%
Valiant Capital Management
03
20.0%
G Research
New
16.0%
Arena Investors LP
12
12.0%
Bayview Asset Management LLC
04
8.0%
Marshall Wace
New
4.0%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management
04
0.0%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Bayview Asset Management LLC (69.9%)
01
96.2%
Marshall Wace (36.6%)
New
92.3%
Oak Hill Advisors (36.6%)
No
88.5%
Abdiel Capital (35.5%)
01
84.6%
D.E. Shaw (32.9%)
02
80.8%
AQR Capital Management (28.8%)
02
76.9%
Bridgewater Associates (25.5%)
01
73.1%
Magnetar Capital (24.4%)
10
69.2%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (23.9%)
New
65.4%
Valiant Capital Management (19.9%)
No
61.5%
Two Sigma Investments (18.2%)
02
57.7%
Man Group (17.1%)
05
53.8%
Citadel Investment Group (16.2%)
02
50.0%
Point72 (14.4%)
03
46.2%
Millennium Management (10.0%)
01
42.3%
Arena Investors LP (3.9%)
10
38.5%
Squarepoint Capital (3.7%)
02
34.6%
G Research (3.2%)
05
30.8%
Oaktree Capital Management (3.2%)
12
26.9%
Blackstone Group (3.2%)
16
23.1%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (2.8%)
08
19.2%
Exoduspoint (1.6%)
10
15.4%
Millennium Partners (1.5%)
10
11.5%
Balyasny Asset Management (1.5%)
12
7.7%
Qube Research and Technologies (1.5%)
03
3.8%
Worldquant (1.2%)
08
0.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (73.0%)
No
96.2%
Blackstone Group (35.1%)
03
92.3%
Bridgewater Associates (30.9%)
No
88.5%
Magnetar Capital (23.4%)
02
84.6%
Man Group (15.8%)
01
80.8%
Point72 (14.2%)
01
76.9%
Balyasny Asset Management (8.5%)
02
73.1%
Worldquant (6.9%)
02
69.2%
Millennium Management (6.6%)
01
65.4%
Two Sigma Investments (4.8%)
04
61.5%
AQR Capital Management (4.4%)
01
57.7%
Citadel Investment Group (3.5%)
01
53.8%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (2.2%)
New
50.0%
Arena Investors LP (2.2%)
10
46.2%
Marshall Wace (1.8%)
New
42.3%
G Research (1.8%)
03
38.5%
Oak Hill Advisors (1.8%)
05
34.6%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (1.8%)
05
30.8%
Oaktree Capital Management (1.8%)
11
26.9%
Valiant Capital Management (1.8%)
05
23.1%
Abdiel Capital (1.2%)
10
19.2%
Exoduspoint (0.9%)
10
15.4%
Millennium Partners (0.8%)
10
11.5%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.8%)
03
7.7%
D.E. Shaw (0.3%)
12
3.8%
Squarepoint Capital (0.3%)
08
0.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
G Research (33.7%)
No
96.2%
AQR Capital Management (4.1%)
01
92.3%
Point72 (1.6%)
01
88.5%
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb (0.4%)
New
84.6%
Arena Investors LP (0.4%)
08
80.8%
Marshall Wace (0.4%)
New
76.9%
Oak Hill Advisors (0.4%)
04
73.1%
Bayview Asset Management LLC (0.4%)
04
69.2%
Oaktree Capital Management (0.4%)
12
65.4%
Valiant Capital Management (0.4%)
04
61.5%
Blackstone Group (0.4%)
09
57.7%
Davidson Kempner Capital Management (0.3%)
05
53.8%
Man Group (0.3%)
10
50.0%
Magnetar Capital (0.2%)
11
46.2%
Abdiel Capital (0.2%)
07
42.3%
Exoduspoint (0.2%)
08
38.5%
Millennium Partners (0.2%)
10
34.6%
Balyasny Asset Management (0.2%)
08
30.8%
Qube Research and Technologies (0.2%)
03
26.9%
Worldquant (0.1%)
08
23.1%
Two Sigma Investments (0.1%)
09
19.2%
D.E. Shaw (0.1%)
12
15.4%
Millennium Management (0.1%)
09
11.5%
Citadel Investment Group (0.1%)
07
7.7%
Squarepoint Capital (0.1%)
04
3.8%
Bridgewater Associates (0.1%)
07
0.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.